Re: [Mtgvenue] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-06.txt

[Eliot Lear <[e-mail]>]

Hi everyone,

This draft intends to address the following issues:

  * #1: What means "mandatory/important/..."
  * #3: Too much mandatory
  * #4: Process innovation
  * #5: Clarity on definitions re hotel rooms and the facility in Section 3
  * #6: Terminology hard to follow
  * #7: Clarity of responsibility
  * #8: What if Target list of cities is not known?
  * #9: Concurrent objection?
  * #10: What happens if there is a change of policies in the interim?
  * #11: Text seems strange
  * #12: Sponsor required as mandatory?
  * #13: Handling repeats
  * #16: What is consensus on? venue selection or process?
  * #17: Timing of 3 month final check

Each of these issues has been tagged with the -06 milestone.

Probably we will not need to do anything with issue 18 (Align
mandatories with values).

I would expect there to be additional issues opened at this point, as I
might have got something wrong.  This draft is yours, not mine, so
please feel free to offer proposed edits or backouts (I'll have a few
myself with my editor hat off).  Speaking of which, let me draw your
attention to Section 5.  In my opinion we have not yet settled on
chapeau text, and have left an editorial comment in there indicating as
such.  In addition, In addressing issues 10 and 17, as well as Alissa's
comments, I've attempted to provide some guidance as to what should
happen AFTER the contract is signed, but it is relatively minimal.  My
suggestion is that if we cannot agree on some text along those lines
relatively quickly we simply excise the section.

There are a number of newer issues that need to be addressed and are
not.  There are also some issues that are holding, pending resolution of
the above.  As such, you might reasonably expect an update in May based
on this working group's progress.

Eliot

On 4/18/17 9:44 AM, [e-mail] wrote:
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Meeting Venue of the IETF.
>
>         Title           : IETF Plenary Meeting Venue Selection Process
>         Authors         : Ray Pelletier
>                           Laura Nugent
>                           Dave Crocker
>                           Lou Berger
>                           Ole Jacobsen
>                           Jim Martin
>                           Fred Baker
>                           Eliot Lear
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-06.txt
> 	Pages           : 28
> 	Date            : 2017-04-18
>
> Abstract:
>    The IAOC has responsibility for arranging IETF plenary meeting Venue
>    selection and operation.  This document details the IETF's Meeting
>    Venue Selection Process from the perspective of its goals, criteria
>    and thought processes.  It points to additional process documents on
>    the IAOC Web Site that go into further detail and are subject to
>    change with experience.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process/
>
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-06
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-06
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-06
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mtgvenue mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue
>