IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Mtgvenue] (Section 4) Re: AD evaluation of draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-10

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Tue, 09 January 2018 17:53 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C47012422F for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 09:53:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D_91NzhFVJAw for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 09:53:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D5E51200FC for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 09:53:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2808; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1515520431; x=1516730031; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to; bh=kwvbp5j/o4hEYa6UDxxmZwD1GCHYfTNdK3p89VzTmYs=; b=ZtUnLPDaGJ9tHifb3FjOwJ8utF0wo3ZVTTyskC4lLhRtzyPZ/apl7nV8 CptFDdQzl+mp1VCtqQWWxIvKNhMFFp8aUbLzAv6ahzTTnL+g1AhmRCZOv VyzChiH+9LHblj+RVwgrmwjKxD7y1MmLHnd2zj7bbZ1OSnULNe2qy/O0s E=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 488
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.46,336,1511827200"; d="asc'?scan'208"; a="1357813"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Jan 2018 17:53:49 +0000
Received: from [10.61.225.122] ([10.61.225.122]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w09HrnDX010630; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 17:53:49 GMT
To: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com>, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>, "mtgvenue@ietf.org" <mtgvenue@ietf.org>
References: <5B74044C-11B9-422B-BE1B-8AB6892EEC46@cooperw.in> <20180105204121.x5ws6cugjljwp6ul@mx4.yitter.info> <FAFAA997-D421-4639-BF29-245E8BE23733@cooperw.in> <20180105211632.47v6dqyf5gxh6p2a@mx4.yitter.info> <96125a43-8f15-ebae-b135-8bc0674694cf@cisco.com> <B3585C21-417F-4467-A7A0-A99CA62BE871@cisco.com>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <0ad41211-7599-e597-a2e2-0cf4face5bb0@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2018 18:53:48 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <B3585C21-417F-4467-A7A0-A99CA62BE871@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="JnH0NAiAof7643V5s4fHlhmcsswSWUIc1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/DLcInXPSci37RtyZ19_dCeoYdSA>
Subject: [Mtgvenue] (Section 4) Re: AD evaluation of draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-10
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2018 17:53:53 -0000

Barring any objections I will proceed along the lines below to resolve
Alissa's comments.


On 09.01.18 18:52, Charles Eckel (eckelcu) wrote:
>
> I do not recall past discussions about anything more than making minor clarifications to this section. It has been in the draft since the beginning:
>  
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-baker-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-00
>
> Looking through meeting minutes and email archives, I see no discussions or debates about removing it.
>  
> My opinion is that it is best to keep this section in the document. It is possible that it will need to be updated to reflect changes that occur as a result of IASA 2.0, but that is okay.
> The changes hashed out by Alissa and Brian later in this same thread seem helpful at addressing the specific issue raised with this section.
>
> Cheers,
> Charles
>     
>     
>     
>     
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email