IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Mtgvenue] AD evaluation of draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-10

"Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com> Tue, 09 January 2018 17:52 UTC

Return-Path: <eckelcu@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8B7412422F for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 09:52:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.53
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.53 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hI__3S3HU4Mg for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 09:52:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C4801200FC for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 09:52:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2842; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1515520326; x=1516729926; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=FOfhlv8HEexvpzl5JpeKNhtrGj+Ttiysr68KCmjz8Mg=; b=ICg+YgZfNN8P3N9HC9A17n2Rd4Y1NCIww2ntLEuwDdncVXiynQ0BS750 0gMfAXXaz8aQDenQdFHclEQ0X7E/OkXFI/+QxacMoHtMK4ujjiQkWLBeN 5SUtjYxLMO7Bu/R5EYMugxaaFwXKQBk14xHVyuCeY1N3b+UaOHvtyaK6e Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CPAQCkAFVa/4oNJK1eGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYNAZnQnB4QAiiSOXoFbJ5cuFIIBCiWFFgIahCA/GAEBAQEBAQEBAWsohSMBAQEEIxFRBAIBCBEDAQIBAgImAgICMBUICAIEARKKMRCubIInijwBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARkFgQ+DEYIVg0ApDIJ5gy8BgTsBEgEfF4MAMYI0BaNfAogIjTeCF5FyimGCVIk3AhEZAYE7AR85YHBvFWcBgX+DCYFOeIhugSWBFwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,336,1511827200"; d="scan'208";a="334962862"
Received: from alln-core-5.cisco.com ([173.36.13.138]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Jan 2018 17:52:04 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-019.cisco.com (xch-aln-019.cisco.com [173.36.7.29]) by alln-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w09Hq4u6014554 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 9 Jan 2018 17:52:05 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-018.cisco.com (173.36.7.28) by XCH-ALN-019.cisco.com (173.36.7.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 11:52:04 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-018.cisco.com ([173.36.7.28]) by XCH-ALN-018.cisco.com ([173.36.7.28]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 11:52:04 -0600
From: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com>
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>, "mtgvenue@ietf.org" <mtgvenue@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Mtgvenue] AD evaluation of draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-10
Thread-Index: AQHThlzCe/ThySH5Zki7SNplT80hAaNmIvKAgAAFIwCAAASxAIAAEM0AgAV5b4A=
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2018 17:52:04 +0000
Message-ID: <B3585C21-417F-4467-A7A0-A99CA62BE871@cisco.com>
References: <5B74044C-11B9-422B-BE1B-8AB6892EEC46@cooperw.in> <20180105204121.x5ws6cugjljwp6ul@mx4.yitter.info> <FAFAA997-D421-4639-BF29-245E8BE23733@cooperw.in> <20180105211632.47v6dqyf5gxh6p2a@mx4.yitter.info> <96125a43-8f15-ebae-b135-8bc0674694cf@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <96125a43-8f15-ebae-b135-8bc0674694cf@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.28.0.171108
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.154.179.55]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <5C29EBFDA965BB49B838116C945C0290@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/LlO7TajXUYp9LcLl_lNfN15f1zg>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] AD evaluation of draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-10
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2018 17:52:09 -0000

-----Original Message-----
From: Mtgvenue <mtgvenue-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of "lear@cisco.com" <lear@cisco.com>
Date: Friday, January 5, 2018 at 2:16 PM
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>, "mtgvenue@ietf.org" <mtgvenue@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] AD evaluation of draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-10

    Hi,
    
    
    On 05.01.18 22:16, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
    > On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 03:59:44PM -0500, Alissa Cooper wrote:
    >> Delete it? I don’t think this section aims to be complete in any event.
    > I'm for that.
    >
    >> Overall, Section 4 gives me some pause because some of it is repeating material from BCP 101, and some of it seems to be enshrining mechanics internal to IASA that should (IMO) be more flexible to change than what would be required to update this document. I am willing to defer to the WG consensus to keep the section, however, which is why I didn’t mention this in my initial review.
    >>
    > I can't dig it out right now, but I seem to recall making an earlier
    > remark to the same effect.  I think the WG pushed back, but maybe we
    > need to revisit that.
    >
    
    I need the chairs' guidance before continuing.  I don't specifically
    recall a decision about that text as a whole, one way or another.
    
    Eliot

I do not recall past discussions about anything more than making minor clarifications to this section. It has been in the draft since the beginning:
 
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-baker-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-00

Looking through meeting minutes and email archives, I see no discussions or debates about removing it.
 
My opinion is that it is best to keep this section in the document. It is possible that it will need to be updated to reflect changes that occur as a result of IASA 2.0, but that is okay.
The changes hashed out by Alissa and Brian later in this same thread seem helpful at addressing the specific issue raised with this section.

Cheers,
Charles

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email