IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Mtgvenue] Issue 4: process innovation

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Wed, 05 April 2017 13:43 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0D1F128DF6 for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 06:43:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.523
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.523 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ssSkt7p0_6wN for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 06:43:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7119B128854 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 06:43:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1658; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1491399786; x=1492609386; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:mime-version; bh=LIlL3xfASrUpt9NwPEbTECkAmQaRDnJVzhcf7F8pVFs=; b=IeUxWzLuQrrh8g7n+/3l1jQ0pM/4Zyubro9leyP1qUOyGfUcWYxCxrcZ 0m3hGB8m/OzaAJZ67KAwJJYYf9tYhM/ZOaRSutdJcqrqEonpqYahAFqOa 9FWZ+RfJUN0i9kDzKoWCGGaNR1ia9tYbGqCaxEdOoTRN5WO4msX9xvi/5 Q=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 481
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0C3AgBS8+RY/4MNJK1cGwEBAQMBAQEJAQEBg1SFT4oSkRyVdIIOiW8/GAECAQEBAQEBAWsdC4U/gTMCXw0IAQGKCps0kAeCJoppAQEIAgEWD4hTCYo+gl8FnHCDfIINjEmBZQGIe4Zbk3YfOIEFJRYIGBWHHD6JfgEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.36,278,1486425600"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="229147534"
Received: from alln-core-1.cisco.com ([173.36.13.131]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 05 Apr 2017 13:43:05 +0000
Received: from [10.86.241.121] (che-vpn-cluster-1-376.cisco.com [10.86.241.121]) by alln-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v35Dh4Ui026157 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 13:43:05 GMT
To: "mtgvenue@ietf.org" <mtgvenue@ietf.org>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <4425a977-03e9-0993-090b-3fd9736cfe44@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2017 15:43:02 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="k47dM49Ghw3GM4BEqltu1G9lxlJOiv2q3"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/TC_BqupsUbOAX8STKj3cG-7_e6E>
Subject: [Mtgvenue] Issue 4: process innovation
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2017 13:43:07 -0000

Based on the meeting results, the following text is to be removed:

   IETF consensus, with respect to this meeting Venue selection process
   is judged via standard IETF process and not by any other means, e.g.,
   surveys.  Surveys are used to gather information related to meeting
   venues, but not to measure consensus or to be reported as consensus.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email