decreases in MTU

sytek!rfox@Sun.COM (Rich Fox) Sat, 03 March 1990 22:34 UTC

Received: from decwrl.dec.com by acetes.pa.dec.com (5.54.5/4.7.34) id AA04401; Sat, 3 Mar 90 14:34:30 PST
Received: by decwrl.dec.com; id AA25136; Sat, 3 Mar 90 14:34:27 -0800
Received: from sun.Sun.COM (sun-bb.Corp.Sun.COM) by Sun.COM (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA11534; Sat, 3 Mar 90 14:34:21 PST
Received: from sytek.UUCP by sun.Sun.COM (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA02796; Sat, 3 Mar 90 14:34:18 PST
Received: by sytek.hls.hac.com (5.51/5.17) id AA01449; Sat, 3 Mar 90 13:26:45 PST
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 90 13:26:45 PST
From: sytek!rfox@Sun.COM (Rich Fox)
Message-Id: <9003032126.AA01449@sytek.hls.hac.com>
To: mtudwg
Subject: decreases in MTU

Steve,

  In your new scheme how is the descrease/increase of the MTU handled?
It seems that this is a potential problem.


rich