IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Mud] changes to draft-richardson-opsawg-mud-iot-dns-considerations-03.txt

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Thu, 24 September 2020 16:23 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mud@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mud@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 026AD3A105A; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 09:23:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b-TILF5g1LhY; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 09:23:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43FC93A1002; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 09:23:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1330; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1600964632; x=1602174232; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc: to:references; bh=2QMQGmobc3TH6hF5Nm3gEHtAUqHLY5nyke3Zsq9OcU4=; b=PCTXDCTQVxikfEbQJlo0urvVW78jooILJSiL6B2qv1VJ0sUb4Zzv+E3M 6kt2L+RHPdg5K8G2tRfQGtgCroVljhp8OD9aOvnJVZIJSdmoDevQyukzt cq9u/UOxRci7paJ3E0GUWMzW4HKuEn18LR9jaxOWbYm9MjtZFyDq1Lreg 4=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 488
X-IPAS-Result: A0CBAADzxmxf/xbLJq1fGgEBAQEBAQEBAQEDAQEBARIBAQEBAgIBAQEBgg8Cg20BMiyEPIkCiEGcIQQHAQEBCgMBAS8EAQGESwKCLyU5BQ0CAwEBAQMCAwEBAQEFAQEBAgEGBG2FaIVyAQEBAQIBI1YFCwsYKgICVwYTgyYBglwgtkN2gTKFU4UIEIE4AYFSi3aCAIE4HIJNPodUM4ItBJAai1abR4JxgxOBNZYNAx+CegGPHY51ryuDXAIEBgUCFYFsIoFXMxoIGxVlAYI+PhIZDZxoPwMwNwIGAQkBAQMJj3YBAQ
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,298,1596499200"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="27456618"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 24 Sep 2020 16:23:48 +0000
Received: from [10.61.248.19] ([10.61.248.19]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 08OGNl5A016380 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 24 Sep 2020 16:23:48 GMT
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-Id: <BCB5CBD9-78C0-471A-8C32-88E4FD406136@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_866B6D48-93F6-4454-99FA-19576FD4A667"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\))
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 18:23:45 +0200
In-Reply-To: <15779.1600960819@localhost>
Cc: opsawg@ietf.org, mud@ietf.org
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
References: <160082461431.2339.6222888407127336620@ietfa.amsl.com> <15779.1600960819@localhost>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1)
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.61.248.19, [10.61.248.19]
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-4.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mud/v7oXatHlhLLiI3zsjB6I87KxodE>
Subject: Re: [Mud] changes to draft-richardson-opsawg-mud-iot-dns-considerations-03.txt
X-BeenThere: mud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of Manufacturer Ussage Descriptions <mud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mud>, <mailto:mud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mud/>
List-Post: <mailto:mud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mud>, <mailto:mud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 16:23:54 -0000


> On 24 Sep 2020, at 17:20, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> 
> 
> I would like the OPSAWG to consider adopting this MUD related document.
> It changes no bits on the wire changes to MUD or semantic changes (like my
> other document), rather this is guidance to IoT manufacturers.
> 

I’d like that too.

Eliot

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email