Re: [multimob] WG adoption call on draft-zuniga-multimob-pmipv6-ropt

"Thomas C. Schmidt" <schmidt@informatik.haw-hamburg.de> Fri, 09 December 2011 06:33 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=317cfe919=schmidt@informatik.haw-hamburg.de>
X-Original-To: multimob@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: multimob@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EEBA21F84B8 for <multimob@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Dec 2011 22:33:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bprpo6KQz2hg for <multimob@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Dec 2011 22:33:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx6.haw-public.haw-hamburg.de (mx6.haw-public.haw-hamburg.de [141.22.6.3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF63121F84B9 for <multimob@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Dec 2011 22:33:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailgate.informatik.haw-hamburg.de ([141.22.30.74]) by mail6.is.haw-hamburg.de with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 09 Dec 2011 07:33:31 +0100
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailgate.informatik.haw-hamburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4ADF102C0C7; Fri, 9 Dec 2011 07:33:31 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mailgate.informatik.haw-hamburg.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailgate.informatik.haw-hamburg.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 07770-01; Fri, 9 Dec 2011 07:33:31 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [172.17.192.67] (75-148-178-225-Houston.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [75.148.178.225]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailgate.informatik.haw-hamburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 83AC61039E84; Fri, 9 Dec 2011 07:33:30 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <4EE1ABC3.4010208@informatik.haw-hamburg.de>
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 00:33:39 -0600
From: "Thomas C. Schmidt" <schmidt@informatik.haw-hamburg.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Hitoshi Asaeda <asaeda@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
References: <CAC8QAcc9NhSKO5Fz9C9JcVsku+OSXcBWe_PgjqoySMiA3doJ_w@mail.gmail.com> <20111209.093148.123963742.asaeda@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
In-Reply-To: <20111209.093148.123963742.asaeda@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at informatik.haw-hamburg.de
Cc: multimob@ietf.org, sarikaya2012@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [multimob] WG adoption call on draft-zuniga-multimob-pmipv6-ropt
X-BeenThere: multimob@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multicast Mobility <multimob.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/multimob>, <mailto:multimob-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/multimob>
List-Post: <mailto:multimob@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:multimob-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multimob>, <mailto:multimob-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 06:33:54 -0000

Hi Hitoshi,

On 08.12.2011 18:31, Hitoshi Asaeda wrote:
>
> I don't think there was any consensus about adoption of this draft at
> the last meeting.
>
> We've proposed the tunnel convergence problem solution draft;
> draft-asaeda-multimob-pmip6-extension-07
>
> Why you eliminate the discussions in the meeting and the chance to
> discuss in the mailing list?
>
> Before explaining the thoughts about draft-zuniga draft, I'd make you
> understand the situation of our draft.
>
> 1. I think Thomas always misunderstands the point. MAG is a router and
>     has its own RIB. PIM can use its RIB and can copy it to its MRIB.

No, MAG's RIB doesn't reflect PMIP routing and the proposed implications 
are a simple mistake.

Hitoshi, I spent half the summer trying to explain to you how PMIP 
routing works - you wouldn't listen and I gave up.

Then Sri stepped in and explained the same thing again: The MAG performs 
policy-based routing according to policy filters, not according to a 
regular RIB.

Again in Taipei, Sri explained PMIP routing and I guess (almost) 
everybody in the room understood his words.

So, if you still argue on the issue, please argue against the PMIP 
authors, not against me. I have no iron in the fire, here, and only 
tried to mediate ...

Cheers,

Thomas
-- 

Prof. Dr. Thomas C. Schmidt
° Hamburg University of Applied Sciences                   Berliner Tor 7 °
° Dept. Informatik, Internet Technologies Group    20099 Hamburg, Germany °
° http://www.haw-hamburg.de/inet                   Fon: +49-40-42875-8452 °
° http://www.informatik.haw-hamburg.de/~schmidt    Fax: +49-40-42875-8409 °