IETF Logo Mail Archive

[multimob] draft-asaeda-multimob-pmip6-extension-05

Behcet Sarikaya <behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com> Mon, 21 March 2011 21:50 UTC

Return-Path: <behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com>
X-Original-To: multimob@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: multimob@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B786E3A68ED for <multimob@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 14:50:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.341
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.341 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.258, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id il2WCqd0FSFi for <multimob@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 14:50:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nm30-vm1.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com (nm30-vm1.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com [98.139.91.239]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 170043A68EA for <multimob@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 14:50:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [98.139.91.63] by nm30.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 21 Mar 2011 21:52:25 -0000
Received: from [98.139.91.24] by tm3.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 21 Mar 2011 21:52:25 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1024.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 21 Mar 2011 21:52:25 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-5
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 317228.23498.bm@omp1024.mail.sp2.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 41815 invoked by uid 60001); 21 Mar 2011 21:52:25 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1300744344; bh=2CkknHlBeisvqcimdE3RiG2MbE9hq0Ps+ln2SaFdxrI=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=vkaU/6NrZKDaUnykRYKo2tFHgI+0Eq92wrvcCiu5wPkDD9lrmmF+8Ml9tUFdjr/7Ys1hU65vBg/uhJzoOGIOMPOfcHIiQYtyHTZMPLOVNkH12QZ/kRJUlMPAJPXwvN2L5ZMpX1BUoCF+uGe9N4savryqvMTD5fl4hvEViXWcNng=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=F1bqrVVhtN/E8eUlSEmS/uUsE538ZGH5SmoK7Sh1hyeSmaqcUlUbso6QVAwrE139e2QclqaWikTQBE1ydwL2tFS4xvUWbXccNESvpJ56RNOSVy/cgXW/XQcEDrBmRCe6tzvd7XJ5nhdlV95WjcRUIucZz7F/YQyH8myRm8oSD8A=;
Message-ID: <956246.22143.qm@web111408.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
X-YMail-OSG: YP_MzrgVM1mGDORfpkvaRa9ruBEpW9UuBTc3mpeYmf4VDWi ZebBHIpSbsSfFGZuZ4Uj4GrYoVPX.IalMF1iXe4efdRyk.TbuiFP5hbtdOSy 1bVMTA7RZL2UIgaPygisXoXG.DXBeTtSrX7QpB5MUq8tI9.vFEbw0G1Cfapo u0o6b8gmkiD1l6oIkEcQLWoqhYm_GvMZyQhx66lj56fXC1J2ZSICkp98XZ_c 4x4tteaxWSiK_v_mN0ieULspZvkG6mP.BAo3X7bRWX8Ku0QeYylM0b6mGmBm he0hY.VEdzZHnKZb_rP6KaHHHrK.AzBdyNx9o6.O2xMyqUKFBdUiMH_VN3XB wXB1Gy_TBH_kq726pssk.zuUpGd2T5txPLRDH1jHaub5f8Sjgef5gnzndarv YYoZVV3Z1H5MWhw--
Received: from [206.16.17.212] by web111408.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 14:52:24 PDT
X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/559 YahooMailWebService/0.8.109.295617
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 14:52:24 -0700
From: Behcet Sarikaya <behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com>
To: Hitoshi Asaeda <asaeda@sfc.wide.ad.jp>, multimob@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: [multimob] draft-asaeda-multimob-pmip6-extension-05
X-BeenThere: multimob@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya@ieee.org>
List-Id: Multicast Mobility <multimob.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multimob>, <mailto:multimob-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/multimob>
List-Post: <mailto:multimob@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:multimob-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multimob>, <mailto:multimob-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 21:50:54 -0000

Hi Hitoshi,
  I read your draft and have some comments.
In section 3.3, you say MN sends MLD Report upon multicast data reception. Why? 
I think there is something wrong in that sentence.

Your draft is long and detailed and on top of that it mentions [9] 
draft-asaeda-multimob-igmp-mld-mobility-extensions-03.txt as normative 
reference. 


What I am more curious about is how your draft solves the tunnel convergence 
problem. I don't think it is the M-Tunnel because as you mentioned M-Tunnel is 
MAG-LMA tunnel as in [2], i.e. RFC 5213. 

I don't think it is MAG as PIM-SM router as you mention that operators would not 
like it. Sorry but I could not find a specific solution proposal in your draft. 
Maybe I missed something.

How relevant your Section 7 is to the tunnel convergence solution? I have a 
feeling that  it is more relevant for handover optimizations work item we have.

Regards,

Behcet

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email