IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [multimob] draft-asaeda-multimob-pmip6-extension-05

Hitoshi Asaeda <asaeda@sfc.wide.ad.jp> Thu, 24 March 2011 20:22 UTC

Return-Path: <asaeda@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
X-Original-To: multimob@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: multimob@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E26A3A6846 for <multimob@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 13:22:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, RELAY_IS_203=0.994, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q7X0KhV5lu8i for <multimob@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 13:22:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.sfc.wide.ad.jp (shonan.sfc.wide.ad.jp [203.178.142.130]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB2443A67F1 for <multimob@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 13:22:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (40.119.71-86.rev.gaoland.net [86.71.119.40]) by mail.sfc.wide.ad.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9DA692780E5; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 05:23:52 +0900 (JST)
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 21:23:51 +0100
Message-Id: <20110324.212351.02807382.asaeda@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
To: sarikaya@ieee.org, behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com
From: Hitoshi Asaeda <asaeda@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
In-Reply-To: <555485.90600.qm@web111411.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
References: <491930.98674.qm@web111416.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <20110324.094406.10596817.asaeda@sfc.wide.ad.jp> <555485.90600.qm@web111411.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.2.51 on Emacs 22.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: multimob@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [multimob] draft-asaeda-multimob-pmip6-extension-05
X-BeenThere: multimob@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multicast Mobility <multimob.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multimob>, <mailto:multimob-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/multimob>
List-Post: <mailto:multimob@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:multimob-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multimob>, <mailto:multimob-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 20:22:22 -0000

Hi Behcet,

>   Looking at the draft name, i.e. it is about pmip6 extensions, it
> seems to have 
> much larger scope.
> I suggest revising it to address only 
> PMIPv6 routing optimizations to avoid tunnel convergence problem
> 
> maybe you can have another draft to address 
> handover optimizations.

Our approach (extension) supports routing optimizations and seamless
handover, but it is pretty simple.

We propose to set up the bi-directional tunnel called M-Tunnel that is
dedicated to multicast transmission.
And the protocol extensions are only new PBU-M message for PMIPv6 and
new M-CTD message for CXTP.
There are no other extensions.

If we have concensus, I would be able to split my current draft to two
drafts. But IMO, it is reasonable to keep it as is.

Regards,
--
Hitoshi Asaeda

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email