Re: [multipathtcp] Summary and more

[marcelo bagnulo braun <[e-mail]>]

Mark Handley escribió:
> Is there a more recent version?  That one expired a while back.  Is it dead now?
>
>   
the draft is dead

> I agree there's a lot of overlap, but it isn't precisely the same
> problem.
how come is not the same problem?
I mean, what is the difference that you see?

>   If the draft is dead, do you have any problem with me
> re-using text from it, where appropriate?
>
>   
sure, no problem

Regards, marcelo

>  - Mark
>
> 2009/9/4 marcelo bagnulo braun <[e-mail]>:
>   
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> I think such a document exists, with proposed solutions as well.
>>
>> please see
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-shim6-ingress-filtering-00
>>
>> Regards, marcelo
>>
>>
>>
>> Mark Handley escribió:
>>     
>>> Folks,
>>>
>>> It's clear from the ongoing discussion that we haven't yet documented
>>> the options and issues for routing of outgoing packets with multi-path
>>> TCP sufficiently.  I propose that I write a short document summarizing
>>> the issues on this topic.  I expect this will become part of the
>>> architecture document of the working group, but for now the important
>>> thing is to gather the discussion together in one place so we can see
>>> what do understand, what we don't understand,  and how host
>>> requirements might change (if at all).
>>>
>>> Can I request that some of the energy currently going into this email
>>> exchange be put into reviewing the document when I've written it, so
>>> you can tell me what I've got wrong!
>>>
>>>  - Mark
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>>     
>
>