Re: [multipathtcp] Summary and more

[Mark Handley <[e-mail]>]

Is there a more recent version?  That one expired a while back.  Is it dead now?

I agree there's a lot of overlap, but it isn't precisely the same
problem.  If the draft is dead, do you have any problem with me
re-using text from it, where appropriate?

 - Mark

2009/9/4 marcelo bagnulo braun <[e-mail]>:
> Hi Mark,
>
> I think such a document exists, with proposed solutions as well.
>
> please see
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-shim6-ingress-filtering-00
>
> Regards, marcelo
>
>
>
> Mark Handley escribió:
>>
>> Folks,
>>
>> It's clear from the ongoing discussion that we haven't yet documented
>> the options and issues for routing of outgoing packets with multi-path
>> TCP sufficiently.  I propose that I write a short document summarizing
>> the issues on this topic.  I expect this will become part of the
>> architecture document of the working group, but for now the important
>> thing is to gather the discussion together in one place so we can see
>> what do understand, what we don't understand,  and how host
>> requirements might change (if at all).
>>
>> Can I request that some of the energy currently going into this email
>> exchange be put into reviewing the document when I've written it, so
>> you can tell me what I've got wrong!
>>
>>  - Mark
>>
>>
>
>