Re: [multipathtcp] Implementers meeting in Hiroshima

[Michio Honda <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

Wednesday afternoon is also fine for me.

Best regards
-Michio

On Nov 5, 2009, at 1:13 , Daniel Migault wrote:

> I would be interested to attempt this meeting since we are working  
> on IPsec and multihoming issues. --i.e. interactions with IKEv2.
>
> Wednesday afternoon after dnsop would be nice for me.
>
> Regards,
>
> Daniel
> 2009/11/4 Sébastien Barré <[e-mail]>
> Hi,
>
> Regarding the second implementation, I will setup a trac platform  
> for that project, so that people can easily contribute, and I will  
> make a first release so that people can easily install for playing.
> I will send another mail as soon as the trac repository is set up,  
> probably by the end of next week. The code is currently using the  
> git scm software, and the git tree will be connected to the trac  
> platform. Unfortunately I will not be able to attend that meeting,  
> but Costin knows well about this implementation.
>
> regards,
>
> Sébastien.
>
> Costin Raiciu a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> We plan to have an mptcp implementers meeting in Hiroshima, with the  
> purpose to coordinate efforts and share knowledge on implementing  
> mptcp. A few people have expressed interest in helping implementing  
> MPTCP. If you still want to help, this is a good time to start.  
> Please reply stating preferences for days and times. Anything except  
> monday afternoon works for me.
>
> I am currently aware of three implementations of mptcp in:
> - userland (based on an older Linux kernel, ported to userland) - by  
> me. It implements a subset of the spec, and works on v4.
> - kernel 2.6, by Sebastien Barre, that works over ipv6 and uses  
> shim6 as a way to provide multiple paths. Soon this is will changed  
> to support v4 and address exchange through options, as defined in  
> the protocol draft.
> - kernel 2.6 by Michio Honda. As far as I know this is incomplete,  
> and doesn't run at all.
>
> Any others?
>
> The second implementation (kernel 2.6) has been coded using the  
> userland experience, so it is more polished, and could be used as a  
> good starting point for a reference implementation.
>
> I will come back with date and time proposals once enough people  
> reply.
>
> Thanks,
> Costin
> _______________________________________________
> multipathtcp mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multipathtcp
>
> -- 
> Sébastien Barré
> Researcher,
> CSE department, UCLouvain, Belgium
> http://inl.info.ucl.ac.be/sbarre
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> multipathtcp mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multipathtcp
>
>
>
> -- 
> Daniel Migault
> Orange Labs -- Security
> [phone]
> _______________________________________________
> multipathtcp mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multipathtcp