IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [multipathtcp] Comments on draft-ietf-mptcp-architecture-02

"Ford, Alan" <alan.ford@roke.co.uk> Mon, 29 November 2010 17:34 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=9949c59b85=alan.ford@roke.co.uk>
X-Original-To: multipathtcp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: multipathtcp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 522F628C193 for <multipathtcp@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 09:34:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.227
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.227 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.372, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ji6kronn-mSM for <multipathtcp@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 09:34:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gse-mta-29.emailfiltering.com (gse-mta-29-tx.emailfiltering.com [194.116.198.160]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E7A028C18A for <multipathtcp@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 09:34:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from salt-ext.roke.co.uk ([109.207.29.2]) by gse-mta-29.emailfiltering.com with emfmta (version 4.6.0.72) vanilla id 221835168 for L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk; 33423c0fad602763; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 17:35:46 +0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 17:35:45 -0000
Message-ID: <2181C5F19DD0254692452BFF3EAF1D680BAABED9@rsys005a.comm.ad.roke.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <FD7B10366AE3794AB1EC5DE97A93A37316BF4494FD@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [multipathtcp] Comments on draft-ietf-mptcp-architecture-02
Thread-Index: AcuEwLvFmVUj0qGgTMak2Uouxnh0PALKJ0NAAABrp6AAADEuIA==
References: <133D9897FB9C5E4E9DF2779DC91E947C045EEB65@SLFSNX.rcs.alcatel-research.de> <2181C5F19DD0254692452BFF3EAF1D680BAABECF@rsys005a.comm.ad.roke.co.uk> <FD7B10366AE3794AB1EC5DE97A93A37316BF4494FD@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk>
From: "Ford, Alan" <alan.ford@roke.co.uk>
To: L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk, Michael.Scharf@alcatel-lucent.com, multipathtcp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [multipathtcp] Comments on draft-ietf-mptcp-architecture-02
X-BeenThere: multipathtcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-path extensions for TCP <multipathtcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multipathtcp>, <mailto:multipathtcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/multipathtcp>
List-Post: <mailto:multipathtcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:multipathtcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multipathtcp>, <mailto:multipathtcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 17:34:40 -0000

Thanks, bad phraseology :-)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk [mailto:L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk]
> Sent: 29 November 2010 17:33
> To: Ford, Alan; Michael.Scharf@alcatel-lucent.com;
multipathtcp@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [multipathtcp] Comments on
draft-ietf-mptcp-architecture-02
> 
> > SCTP is, however, a completely new transport protocol and
> > as such does not meet the network and application compatibility
goals as
> > specified above.
> 
> SCTP went standards-track ten years ago.
> 
> completely new, you say?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email