IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [multrans] link to meeting slides for multrans BoF

Tom Taylor <tom111.taylor@bell.net> Sun, 13 November 2011 00:57 UTC

Return-Path: <tom111.taylor@bell.net>
X-Original-To: multrans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: multrans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9736111E8089 for <multrans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Nov 2011 16:57:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.61
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.61 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.186, BAYES_00=-2.599, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.803, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O+DE9YihfyQd for <multrans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Nov 2011 16:57:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from blu0-omc4-s23.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc4-s23.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.111.162]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B56911E8083 for <multrans@ietf.org>; Sat, 12 Nov 2011 16:57:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from BLU0-SMTP38 ([65.55.111.135]) by blu0-omc4-s23.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sat, 12 Nov 2011 16:57:16 -0800
X-Originating-IP: [76.70.77.190]
X-Originating-Email: [tom111.taylor@bell.net]
Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP38CCABA3BE5F1E8C004E26D8C30@phx.gbl>
Received: from [192.168.2.17] ([76.70.77.190]) by BLU0-SMTP38.phx.gbl over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sat, 12 Nov 2011 16:57:16 -0800
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 19:57:20 -0500
From: Tom Taylor <tom111.taylor@bell.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
References: <C0E0A32284495243BDE0AC8A066631A80C1E05D0@szxeml526-mbs.china.huawei.com> <BLU0-SMTP24236B87B5A606110FF802D8DD0@phx.gbl> <004d01cca0d0$e72adf10$b5809d30$@com>
In-Reply-To: <004d01cca0d0$e72adf10$b5809d30$@com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Nov 2011 00:57:16.0666 (UTC) FILETIME=[30275DA0:01CCA19F]
Cc: multrans@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [multrans] link to meeting slides for multrans BoF
X-BeenThere: multrans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss the work of IPv4-IPv6 multicast." <multrans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/multrans>, <mailto:multrans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/multrans>
List-Post: <mailto:multrans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:multrans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multrans>, <mailto:multrans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 00:57:18 -0000

Below.

On 11/11/2011 7:20 PM, Dan Wing wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: multrans-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:multrans-bounces@ietf.org] On
>> Behalf Of Tom Taylor
>> Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 4:11 AM
...
>
> Slide 8:  yes, IPv6 and IPv4 on the access network is infeasible.  I mean,
> isn't the access network where everybody has insufficient bandwidth for
> carrying the same traffic on both IPv6 and IPv4, isn't it?
>
[PTT] Sorry, I don't get the linkage between this and what the slide says.
>
> -d
>...

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email