IETF Logo Mail Archive

[dnsext] draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-imp-status-00.txt

Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz> Mon, 30 January 2012 20:31 UTC

Return-Path: <dnsext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68E7411E80BB; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:31:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1327955505; bh=dC+UQuF7r7nYQ+IXDwR+KRQlAXcj7pw6IDUSlfQ+De0=; h=Mime-Version:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References:Date:To:From:Cc: Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help: List-Subscribe:Content-Type:Sender; b=SivC6AcKosQIeoV/zRgGO1W/EQEDNciJwTTrioRbt+uT1tPA3YcyWcOXjPUeBNCZr ufx6gINYp2fCjU6WuZem9xoteJ0BS8jEIOIq/p3I/44B6koenvfZPWbOGh2mi0wly/ DHsVi9uf2csdt3wdBPkhua3dXjyTxwweY4mc0Sl0=
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E49D11E80BB for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:31:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.989
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.989 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.608, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 78TMRivV9Kjg for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:31:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stora.ogud.com (stora.ogud.com [66.92.146.20]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C2C511E8091 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:31:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Work-Laptop-2.local (nyttbox.md.ogud.com [10.20.30.4]) by stora.ogud.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q0UKVgJb003437; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:31:43 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz)
Received: from [10.31.203.221] by Work-Laptop-2.local (PGP Universal service); Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:31:43 -0500
X-PGP-Universal: processed; by Work-Laptop-2.local on Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:31:43 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <a06240801cb4cadc7fcdb@[10.31.203.221]>
In-Reply-To: <20120130180338.27331.28809.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20120130180338.27331.28809.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:31:40 -0500
To: dnsext@ietf.org
From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.72 on 10.20.30.4
Cc: ed.lewis@neustar.biz
Subject: [dnsext] draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-imp-status-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4447986978655967843=="
Sender: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org

Stupid question...

Why do we have

"DSA-NSEC3-SHA1" and "RSASHA1-NSEC3-SHA1"

and not

"DSA-NSEC3" and "RSASHA1-NSEC3"?

Is that just they way it was defined in RFC 5155?  Or is it from 
somewhere else?

I.e., why the extra "-SHA1"?

I suppose the ship has sailed on changing that though ... if it were 
changeable.

-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis             
NeuStar                    You can leave a voice message at +1-571-434-5468

2012...time to reuse those 1984 calendars!
_______________________________________________
dnsext mailing list
dnsext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email