IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-imp-status-00.txt

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Mon, 30 January 2012 21:48 UTC

Return-Path: <dnsext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D570321F8489; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:48:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1327960104; bh=MhR8Rfnf7vCvB9Y7Oq6RU5UyBBpIzC0cC7Xo0ntbOug=; h=Mime-Version:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Message-Id:References:To:Cc: Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help: List-Subscribe:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=sISam3oLCURb1rION8PIKb8XpuY3l988E8sksY+ovtUhmTfJtqwm+glBiffeSSZQy p5RKBOxQEKX8gKg6cIy3FRNfXA5Xkzy+3CzGrZqXOmvKD0Y7RNXsIQixIlFVJNOaCF E/WryxslndsI8d+gr6CIYUTCDqW8xWR3Tz918yV4=
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73A2921F8489 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:48:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.555
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.555 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.044, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nXp6C7SH--6I for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:48:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8E9B21F8478 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:48:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.20.30.103] (50-0-66-4.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.0.66.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q0ULmEh4007254 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:48:15 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1)
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <a06240801cb4cadc7fcdb@[10.31.203.221]>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:48:14 -0800
Message-Id: <F12080F4-D231-46A3-8908-5C2F977CE740@vpnc.org>
References: <20120130180338.27331.28809.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <a06240801cb4cadc7fcdb@[10.31.203.221]>
To: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1)
Cc: dnsext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-imp-status-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org

On Jan 30, 2012, at 12:31 PM, Edward Lewis wrote:

> Stupid question...
> 
> Why do we have
> 
> "DSA-NSEC3-SHA1" and "RSASHA1-NSEC3-SHA1"
> 
> and not
> 
> "DSA-NSEC3" and "RSASHA1-NSEC3"?
> 
> Is that just they way it was defined in RFC 5155?  Or is it from somewhere else?
> 
> I.e., why the extra "-SHA1"?

In the future, there might be different hash algorithms to use with NSEC3, yes?

--Paul Hoffman

_______________________________________________
dnsext mailing list
dnsext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email