Re: [dnsext] [dane] TLSA == RRtype 52

[Ondřej Surý <[e-mail]>]

On 16. 4. 2012, at 21:59, Andrew Sullivan wrote:

> This is really a discussion about an issue for the DNSEXT WG, so it's
> cc:d there.  Follow ups should go there, too, unless they're linked
> tightly to the DANE issue.  I didn't adjust the Followup header
> because in my experience that never works.


<dane chair hat on>
Yes, please keep the further discussion off this list.  And everybody
please cool down before responding, or rather do not respond here at all.
</dane chair hat off>

<personal hat on>
Feel free to do whatever you want, but please be aware, that we have
not reached the RFC status yet.  So same rules applies as when you were
using "experimental" allocations in your code.  E.g. if you have tools
which used TYPE655xx, then feel free to use TYPE52, but clearly mark
that as experimental feature, which can change.
</personal hat on>

O.
--
 Ondřej Surý
 vedoucí výzkumu/Head of R&D department
 -------------------------------------------
 CZ.NIC, z.s.p.o.    --    Laboratoře CZ.NIC
 Americka 23, 120 00 Praha 2, Czech Republic
 mailto:[e-mail]    http://nic.cz/
 tel:[phone]       fax:[phone]
 -------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
dnsext mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext