Re: [dnsext] technical errata filed for RFC 1995 (eid=3196/3197)
Alfred Hönes <ah@TR-Sys.de> Wed, 18 April 2012 15:13 UTC
Return-Path: <dnsext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE3E521F85D5; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 08:13:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1334762032; bh=mT5+26iybdbBqU1jb3NWx303l/xoMubGc5ooCbmp42w=; h=From:Message-Id:To:Date:Mime-Version:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=lQD+I5bGzcupz8mqT1J9Gz6u5gSsoT3p7VhPX6QyCPrkgdR6SG+W3i8D4dCOOUvMy 7szriEqoAS4NyLNVKqmhF2NokFvpWGzIGGixf6WqJU5TL8/NTwEghybfX497AApUTv zox3U8z2MMfCDdydFz9jQjNFiHKkuU6ZIOBm3E8M=
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B013221F85D5 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 08:13:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -98.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-98.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.642, BAYES_00=-2.599, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KtyN1VS7eyks for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 08:13:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from TR-Sys.de (gateway.tr-sys.de [213.178.172.147]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C645D21F84E4 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 08:13:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ZEUS.TR-Sys.de by w. with ESMTP ($Revision: 1.37.109.26 $/16.3.2) id AA097431950; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:12:30 +0200
Received: (from ah@localhost) by z.TR-Sys.de (8.9.3 (PHNE_25183)/8.7.3) id RAA28025; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:12:28 +0200 (MESZ)
From: Alfred Hönes <ah@TR-Sys.de>
Message-Id: <201204181512.RAA28025@TR-Sys.de>
To: dnsext@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:12:28 +0200
X-Mailer: ELM [$Revision: 1.17.214.3 $]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [dnsext] technical errata filed for RFC 1995 (eid=3196/3197)
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Recently, Andreas Gustafsson has supplied a DNSIND mailing list thread on RFC 1995 from November 1999 that shows that the technical flaws I had shortly mentioned in the DNSEXT sessions in Maastricht and Prague as a reason to work on a rfc1995bis document already had been pointed out by Andreas in 1999 and have been discussed on dnsind. For the record, I have now filed two corresponding Technical Errata including a short "Historical Note" for clarification of the precedence; see http://www.RFC-Editor.ORG/errata_search.php?rfc=1995 (In the past, the IESG has asked for Errata as an argument that a 'bis' document is needed; so I hope this might help with draft-dnsext-rfc1995bis-ixfr.) Kind regards, Alfred. _______________________________________________ dnsext mailing list dnsext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext
- Re: [dnsext] technical errata filed for RFC 1995 … Alfred Hönes
- Re: [dnsext] technical errata filed for RFC 1995 … Masataka Ohta