Re: [dnsext] Follow up on draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-registry-fixes

Looking just at draft-srose-dnssec-registry-update-00:

1) the propsoed replacement registry no longer mentions that algorithm 
1 has been deprecated (as currently indicated in the IANA registry). 
If that flag is to be removed, perhaps that should be called out in 
section 2.1 as a change.

2) The original IANA registry contains some trailing data re: DH 
primes.  It might be worth explaining/mentioning that.

3) Three algorithms continue to have asterisks in the transaction 
security column (here renamed to Transaction Sign), with a footnote 
(originally from RFC5702) saying "There has been no determination of 
standardization of the use of this algorithm with Transaction 
Security."  Can we say anything more re: these three algorithms' 
usefulness for SIG(0) or TSIG?  If not, we at least need to leave that 
footnote expansion in the registry.

_______________________________________________
dnsext mailing list
dnsext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext