[dnsext] any interest to move bname forward before dnsext closing down

"Jiankang YAO" <yaojk@cnnic.cn> Fri, 13 January 2012 01:18 UTC

Return-Path: <dnsext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D17DF11E8099; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 17:18:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1326417500; bh=XRv4rkU9IzbJs5Ku5qxs0KH01pqL2lBIuWLgnH2s3c0=; h=Message-ID:From:To:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: Content-Type:Sender; b=W9ypKBUisuRLnT4i3yXypuT8432ENNDhkabBudR+3zzE/9r2t/fZ78pUtn9jNgMlV E7qaTzVpCFhBOJt+xB/kGMWsBMWShaEhB9FsE41TB/QGCunN6KqVP4JCu40FwTIOtz VaHT8YdxPOIP/c+1UgsXZMIJ7qVJU6FvUIvBeg0s=
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18D6B11E8099 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 17:18:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.545
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.545 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.300, BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HML+jlE+Fhtd for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 17:18:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cnnic.cn (smtp.cnnic.cn [159.226.7.146]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 1D9C711E8091 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 17:18:18 -0800 (PST)
X-EYOUMAIL-SMTPAUTH: yaojk@cnnic.cn
Received: from unknown127.0.0.1 (HELO lenovo47e041cf) (127.0.0.1) by 127.0.0.1 with SMTP; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 09:18:12 +0800
Message-ID: <47C8025504E444A98A500373ADE7683B@LENOVO47E041CF>
From: Jiankang YAO <yaojk@cnnic.cn>
To: dnsext@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 09:18:12 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
Subject: [dnsext] any interest to move bname forward before dnsext closing down
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0699597640486131473=="
Sender: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org

Dear all,

  cname maps himself. dname maps his children. bname maps both himself and his children.
  I suggest bname as a general tool to map both himself and his children, not aiming at solving idn alias problem. IDN users may or may not choose it to solve their problem.
  I think that bname is a useful tool to map domain A to domain B.

  Is there any interest to move bname forward before dnsext closing down


Jiankang Yao
_______________________________________________
dnsext mailing list
dnsext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext