Re: [dnsext] RFC 6605 (ECDSA in DNSSEC) -- Q & A
SM <sm@resistor.net> Fri, 13 April 2012 16:27 UTC
Return-Path: <dnsext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5595921F8697; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:27:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1334334479; bh=HnObDNFpiWtlrPafXAmVAERL7wEo0342/6yUdRaeDPY=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:In-Reply-To:References:Mime-Version:Cc: Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help: List-Subscribe:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Sender; b=x1g+r/vEZKUol4Znn19+tHpKm9NR2cgoVn/HmWJGK5/2+k4jwUAAt4ztNFthbaEsz Idh/WjS1qXiIS0Z6ksyJtSOaACv3ZP5pB3rDYDDIdKcYoSdlK9jXnN9J1npnvT4prQ ZCiRBUCyYjCz+sev3XNAdafcm25xV/ICXDJQ1V2Y=
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2DB421F8697 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:27:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.478
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.478 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.121, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w7uiBvEIyxKZ for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:27:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C688D21F867F for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:27:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q3DGRn07013262; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:27:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1334334475; i=@resistor.net; bh=L0qfHihmzN9DST56yscSpaSTjZNZWUtLEvowaM+62L0=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=V1CxoJBFuDQ9oiywVVZ29tKh8PQ0eE7Exie7mpmHP6Y8ET9+SqhXzDAZvCdZp7zv1 z2cYcl3e0sFuXZ/FVZ4mWz1GTDzuOogS+FkyzSWERssQpRohZ9/0dJIC3zB+0V2Vyg A6QRxyUn/HAI61dRfI2XUxJRfgjJywagdiIY7r2U=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1334334475; i=@resistor.net; bh=L0qfHihmzN9DST56yscSpaSTjZNZWUtLEvowaM+62L0=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=sGJxR5qk3oiifDMbiv0M3d+tULw+PCmPXZfL2igc2+9vVA9dlVtdI3V/ndayoiZTe Mza0hNox9JhyWfe73YtRFpnYx+8TPhCU3L8DrQDo4ACbTkM68D75fGzdUX8IBA57g7 6a+TxO5a4cO72NOAX1hrmTzkG7Xav8CirA9FwEbQ=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20120413091315.0aa77430@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:20:13 -0700
To: Alfred <ah@TR-Sys.de>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <201204131524.RAA28225@TR-Sys.de>
References: <201204131524.RAA28225@TR-Sys.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Cc: dnsext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] RFC 6605 (ECDSA in DNSSEC) -- Q & A
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Hi Alfred, At 08:24 13-04-2012, Alfred wrote: >I have had some off-list conversations on ECDSA for DNSSEC >and have been encouraged to make the material available and >somehow linked to the just published RFC 6605. As a Friday 13th comment, if you want to make the material somehow linked to RFC 6605, you can file it as an errata. >I try to send my contribution as a .txt attachment. If desired, >the Chairs could include this material into the WG wiki. It's easier to post this as an I-D. If people find it useful at some point, it shouldn't be that difficult to get it published as a RFC. Regards, -sm _______________________________________________ dnsext mailing list dnsext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext
- [dnsext] RFC 6605 (ECDSA in DNSSEC) -- Q & A Alfred Hönes
- [dnsext] informal publication space (was: RFC 660… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] informal publication space (was: RFC… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 6605 (ECDSA in DNSSEC) -- Q & A Francis Dupont
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 6605 (ECDSA in DNSSEC) -- Q & A SM
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 6605 (ECDSA in DNSSEC) -- Q & A Miek Gieben
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 6605 (ECDSA in DNSSEC) -- Q & A Alfred Hönes