Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-2535typecode-change-05.txt

[Mike StJohns <[e-mail]>]

Hi Sam -

I actually didn't read this because it should be (e.g. I assumed it was) 
subsumed by the -protocol document.  Was the obvious bug carried over to 
-protocol?

Later, mike



At 09:58 PM 11/12/2003, Samuel Weiler wrote:
> >       Title           : Legacy Resolver Compatibility for Delegation Signer
> >       Author(s)       : S. Weiler
> >       Filename        : draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-2535typecode-change-05.txt
> >       Pages           : 5
> >       Date            : 2003-10-13
>...
> > A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
> > 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-2535typecode-change-05.txt
>
>There is a trivial but obvious bug in this document.  The thing that
>disturbs me is that it took almost a month for anyone (besides the
>editor) to find it, or at least to point it out.
>
>Thanks to Rob Payne for actually reading the document.  For being the
>first to mention the bug to me, Rob wins a pint of his choice at
>Brit's Pub or some other fine Minneapolis watering hole.
>
>(Read the docs.  You might be surprised at what is (not) in them.
>And if you embarrass the doc editor(s) enough, you might even get free
>beer.)
>
>-- Sam
>
>--
>to unsubscribe send a message to [e-mail] with
>the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
>archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>


--
to unsubscribe send a message to [e-mail] with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>