Re: [dnsext] draft-levine-dnsextlang-02

Miek Gieben <miek@miek.nl> wrote:
>
> Can you just say "this is length of the NEXT item"? Or does it need to be
> generic "this is the length of item <NAME of ITEM>, which is more of a pointer.

Maybe. At the moment there's a very nice one-to-one correspondence between
fields described by the language and as they appear in master files, and
on the wire if you regard a length prefix as part of the field.

> Well, an idea I have floating in my mind is: if your (new) RR can not
> be described in terms of dnsextlang, you should think of a different
> syntax. Not supporting the HIP record would help in that regard.

Yes :-)

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
Forties, Cromarty: Northwesterly 5 to 7. Moderate or rough. Mainly fair. Good,
occasionally poor.
_______________________________________________
dnsext mailing list
dnsext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext