IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-arends-dnsnr-00

Paul Vixie <vixie@vix.com> Mon, 26 July 2004 00:40 UTC

From: Paul Vixie <vixie@vix.com>
Subject: Re: draft-arends-dnsnr-00
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 00:40:22 +0000
Lines: 22
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
References: <Pine.BSO.4.56.0407121709550.12231@trinitario.schlyter.se> <40F7F935.7050204@algroup.co.uk> <40F813B4.9090004@dnss.ec> <40FBD032.3080504@algroup.co.uk> <007f01c46d9a$a0451690$970fa9c3@mobile666> <40FFD194.6070002@algroup.co.uk> <Pine.BSO.4.56.0407221641490.5980@trinitario.schlyter.se> <41014817.4050904@algroup.co.uk> <Pine.BSO.4.56.0407240109280.8561@trinitario.schlyter.se> <16641.44396.938491.414591@giles.gnomon.org.uk> <cdshbu$2e1s$1@sf1.isc.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-From: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org Mon Jul 26 02:50:34 2004
Return-path: <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
To: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <cdshbu$2e1s$1@sf1.isc.org>
Lines: 16
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3
Precedence: bulk
X-Message-ID:
Message-ID: <20140418071904.2560.29136.ARCHIVE@ietfa.amsl.com>

David Blacka <davidb@verisignlabs.com> writes:

> Good lord, people.  You are arguing about the *name* of Roy's proposal. 
> Can't we be a little more productive and, say, suggest an alternate 
> name? And perhaps discuss the *content* of the proposal?

we could do that, and we're apparently (as in NSEC3) going to do that.

however, based on the disagreements about the meaning of the name roy
chose, i think that there's still disagreement about what kind of negative
proofs ("should the middle be excluded?") people actually think is needed.

in other words, the disagreement about the name could be the tip of the
iceberg.
-- 
Paul Vixie

--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email