Re: [dnsext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4509 (2752)

This errata is correct

	Olafur

On 23/03/2011 10:34 PM, RFC Errata System wrote:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC4509,
> "Use of SHA-256 in DNSSEC Delegation Signer (DS) Resource Records (RRs)".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4509&eid=2752
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Matt McCutchen<matt@mattmccutchen.net>
>
> Section: RFC header
>
> Original Text
> -------------
>
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> Updates: 4035
>
> Notes
> -----
> This document should update RFC 4035 because the statement in section 3, "Validator implementations SHOULD ignore DS RRs containing SHA-1 digests if DS RRs with SHA-256 digests are present in the DS RRset", modifies the rules for authenticating referrals in RFC 4035 section 5.2.
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC4509 (draft-ietf-dnsext-ds-sha256-05)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Use of SHA-256 in DNSSEC Delegation Signer (DS) Resource Records (RRs)
> Publication Date    : May 2006
> Author(s)           : W. Hardaker
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : DNS Extensions
> Area                : Internet
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
dnsext mailing list
dnsext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext