[dnsext] Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4635 (2332)
Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com> Thu, 24 March 2011 03:02 UTC
Return-Path: <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E0D43A67E4 for <ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:02:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.395
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.395 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.204, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wG4DyzSe6eyQ for <ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:02:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C921C3A67DF for <namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:02:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.73 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>) id 1Q2aj5-000Jgf-7n for namedroppers-data0@psg.com; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 02:56:43 +0000
Received: from stora.ogud.com ([66.92.146.20]) by psg.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.73 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <ogud@ogud.com>) id 1Q2aj1-000JgJ-HE for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 02:56:39 +0000
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (nyttbox.md.ogud.com [10.20.30.4]) by stora.ogud.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p2O2uaHf009201; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 22:56:36 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from ogud@ogud.com)
Message-ID: <4D8AB2E1.8090308@ogud.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 22:56:33 -0400
From: Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
CC: Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com, rdroms.ietf@gmail.com, jari.arkko@piuha.net, ajs@shinkuro.com, d3e3e3@gmail.com, namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Subject: [dnsext] Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4635 (2332)
References: <20100719220503.766EDE066A@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <20100719220503.766EDE066A@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.20.30.4
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <namedroppers.ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: To unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
List-Unsubscribe: the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
List-Archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>
This errata is correct, Olafur On 19/07/2010 6:05 PM, RFC Errata System wrote: > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC4635, > "HMAC SHA (Hashed Message Authentication Code, Secure Hash Algorithm) TSIG Algorithm Identifiers". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4635&eid=2332 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: Donald Eastlake 3rd<d3e3e3@gmail.com> > > Section: top 1st page > > Original Text > ------------- > Network Working Group D. Eastlake 3rd > Request for Comments: 4635 Motorola Laboratories > Category: Standards Track August 2006 > > Corrected Text > -------------- > Network Working Group D. Eastlake 3rd > Request for Comments: 4635 Motorola Laboratories > Updates 2845 > Category: Standards Track August 2006 > > Notes > ----- > This RFC, which I authored, clearly updates the Original RFC 2845 for TSIG: It makes it MANDATORY to implement HMAC-SHA1 and HMAC-SHA256 if you claim to support TSIG. It defines a new TSIG error code, BADTRUC, and specifies when it is to be returned. This are *significant* *normative* updates to RFC 2845. The RFC index for 2845 and 4635 should be updated to show this. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC4635 (draft-ietf-dnsext-tsig-sha-06) > -------------------------------------- > Title : HMAC SHA (Hashed Message Authentication Code, Secure Hash Algorithm) TSIG Algorithm Identifiers > Publication Date : August 2006 > Author(s) : D. Eastlake 3rd > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : DNS Extensions > Area : Internet > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > > >
- [dnsext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4635 (233… RFC Errata System
- [dnsext] Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4635 … Olafur Gudmundsson