Re: [dnsext] WGLC on draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal-05.txt
Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> Mon, 26 March 2012 23:15 UTC
Return-Path: <dnsext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0055421E8012; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:15:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1332803731; bh=jjMcTnqrj86XZmBVxTHRoSMhrIzgD+j5cDDzpyRrV2A=; h=To:From:References:In-reply-to:Date:Message-Id:Cc:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=d6jIRHMaG5nh/k8qj0jyYDhFL7Dda1Osi6tQmK11fEBvT61w49iA55ioBndQ/js8q PkSd72dGbjPJvDZQoDXvBR9QBB2czTxS4Vb408SgJLt46kjYX2NBnvp/GJZHmqXvzp Xu2rBhdDQMucDRSWLaGufwLsai6eGeq8rbkwesIw=
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25F7D21E8012 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:15:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.366
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.366 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.067, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HXHf0X7zes23 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:15:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:0:2::2b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9BF421E800C for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:15:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bikeshed.isc.org (bikeshed.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:d::19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.isc.org", Issuer "RapidSSL CA" (not verified)) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A906C9422; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 23:15:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marka@isc.org)
Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:820:352f:8a01:b8c3:b367]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by bikeshed.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 06C67216C31; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 23:15:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marka@isc.org)
Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by drugs.dv.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A6761F0EA27; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 10:15:06 +1100 (EST)
To: Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se>
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
References: <18D7F4C6-544F-40CE-91EF-45C77E80AE5F@frobbit.se>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 26 Mar 2012 10:55:35 +0200." <18D7F4C6-544F-40CE-91EF-45C77E80AE5F@frobbit.se>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 10:15:06 +1100
Message-Id: <20120326231507.0A6761F0EA27@drugs.dv.isc.org>
Cc: "<dnsext@ietf.org>" <dnsext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] WGLC on draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal-05.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
In message <18D7F4C6-544F-40CE-91EF-45C77E80AE5F@frobbit.se>, =?iso-8859-1?Q?Pa trik_F=E4ltstr=F6m?= writes: > All, > > First of all, please note the version number I want you to (re-)read. It = > is posted basically "now", but for the ones that want to check before it = > ends up in the repository, I have also attached a copy. > > This version is, I think, answering all questions all individuals have = > had that I have managed to track. I have had private conversation with = > many of you that had comments after version -02, and your comments have = > been passed to the editors. > > I already have enough individuals that have said they have read this = > draft and support it to be able to forward it towards the IESG, so this = > WGLC only have as a goal to ensure there are no more issues. > > I would like to thank, among others, Miek Gieben, Mark Andrews, Marc = > Lampo, Bill Manning, Warren Kumari, Ed Lewis and Dick Franks for the = > review and suggested changes. > > Patrik Patrik, The draft really should explictly state whether a server can use this information to filter RRSIG records or not. This need to be a MAY or a MUST NOT. As currently written I would say this needs to be a MUST NOT. Mark -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org _______________________________________________ dnsext mailing list dnsext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext
- [dnsext] WGLC on draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-si… Patrik Fältström
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC on draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-alg… Miek Gieben
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC on draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-alg… Dick Franks
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC on draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-alg… Mark Andrews