Re: [dnsext] duplicate RRs and resulting RRSIG
Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Fri, 06 January 2012 18:29 UTC
Return-Path: <dnsext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCF7921F886E; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 10:29:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1325874591; bh=gToEYsmCcHx9PEtWqpaVIPTq7EQayZP0dUAN3QpNf1w=; h=Date:From:To:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:Cc: Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help: List-Subscribe:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=HbBGrcoS4D0dpxrc03lWnqMByDiBV8TIxd91oaddXARTAdktaQQcqxX2CbjQbvUrW NPzHsNMH9Pja0aiWNqL2HT/BneED6xvyiE/4OYRD14yn3zqnd2MmL17N10idadiJ9d 3vWLFnFDzXJwpcoQqre1IpqvPTc00trOTiDf0mik=
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E692C21F885F for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 10:29:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.67
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.67 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.929, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o6aqJwRmfgIH for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 10:29:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ppsw-41.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-41.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.141]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C06C21F885C for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 10:29:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-SpamDetails: not scanned
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/
Received: from hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.54]:35175) by ppsw-41.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.156]:25) with esmtpa (EXTERNAL:fanf2) id 1RjEXz-00005g-Rt (Exim 4.72) (return-path <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Fri, 06 Jan 2012 18:29:47 +0000
Received: from fanf2 (helo=localhost) by hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk (hermes.cam.ac.uk) with local-esmtp id 1RjEXz-0008K5-IF (Exim 4.67) (return-path <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Fri, 06 Jan 2012 18:29:47 +0000
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 18:29:47 +0000
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
X-X-Sender: fanf2@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk
To: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
In-Reply-To: <20120104205414.GB3917@vacation.karoshi.com.>
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1201061825570.5322@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <CA+wr5LX8DbiGZnxEtQxRMsiW3Y+RnVHMZsBnuge=783BTL5PiQ@mail.gmail.com> <20120104205414.GB3917@vacation.karoshi.com.>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LSU 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: dnsext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] duplicate RRs and resulting RRSIG
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com <bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com> wrote: > > What you are asserting is that prior to signing, you have two -identical- RRs... > which accordingto RFC 2181, would be two identical RRsets (of a single RR each). You have misunderstood RFC 2181's definition of RRset. Identical RRs have the same owner, type, and class, so are part of the same RRset. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <dot@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ Forties, Cromarty: Southwesterly veering westerly 5 to 7, occasionally gale 8 later. Moderate rough, becoming rough or very rough, occasionally high in north Forties later. Rain then squally showers. Moderate or good. _______________________________________________ dnsext mailing list dnsext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext
- [dnsext] duplicate RRs and resulting RRSIG bert hubert
- Re: [dnsext] duplicate RRs and resulting RRSIG Mohan Parthasarathy
- Re: [dnsext] duplicate RRs and resulting RRSIG bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] duplicate RRs and resulting RRSIG bert hubert
- Re: [dnsext] duplicate RRs and resulting RRSIG Doug Barton
- Re: [dnsext] duplicate RRs and resulting RRSIG SM
- Re: [dnsext] duplicate RRs and resulting RRSIG Marco Davids (SIDN)
- Re: [dnsext] duplicate RRs and resulting RRSIG Tony Finch
- Re: [dnsext] duplicate RRs and resulting RRSIG Tony Finch