Re: [dnsext] duplicate RRs and resulting RRSIG
SM <sm@resistor.net> Wed, 04 January 2012 22:33 UTC
Return-Path: <dnsext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8E2721F86F9; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 14:33:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1325716432; bh=hzFawiBZWVzY/NkV9YW6DxzE8+Nz40oR93vR4r09aXg=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:In-Reply-To:References:Mime-Version:Cc: Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help: List-Subscribe:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Sender; b=yTV3AeitoRNGfIOFGzk2FHq64XkKDVuxOsjseLwtjCa8k2jdTQVZ4z5lf2Ls7sJWL xyNm/j5ghj+c40vQJpVk4ZCacr6NAUNqGMe8x9Ys2NONqqJbgFRSFM4w1F4aQZICL0 5T4Q/2ZYG7UaG413Ze9YBn6s/0s8/B9lD63l3aDY=
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3578C21F86F9 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 14:33:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.58
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.58 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.019, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J6ltYznyXFEl for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 14:33:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17D7B21F86E7 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 14:33:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q04MXe3j002348; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 14:33:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1325716425; i=@resistor.net; bh=OwQIXG5TiUKEXXu5pYvCmUeurCQxsL10pDwmcqrIDfs=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=P9LNLx7r9mwdp1cZozQfnrEM4ZLv8bLGRhGnooi9VGEtxxSiTaYHNcb5dR8g9SU1j vbzZkTumNHTH6+JJ8lymtlwq2ES0nXcVEnyOsAjB+QKLT2aFQTj6nLdGeKzUI/NnQV jv+J4JO/gfsRUSwStdysaaHkC/f558j+H8scDHqk=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20120104142203.0a6f6658@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 14:24:42 -0800
To: Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <4F04C91A.3040408@dougbarton.us>
References: <CA+wr5LX8DbiGZnxEtQxRMsiW3Y+RnVHMZsBnuge=783BTL5PiQ@mail.gmail.com> <CACU5sDm8UZMqkL_jp-jrz5P6S_mOi8mYdi9xNUp7J=5k85d8zA@mail.gmail.com> <20120104205520.GA17188@xs.powerdns.com> <4F04C91A.3040408@dougbarton.us>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Cc: dnsext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] duplicate RRs and resulting RRSIG
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Hi Doug, At 13:48 04-01-2012, Doug Barton wrote: >Personally, I think it's better to kick it back to the user. Otherwise, >how will they learn? Other protocols handle such cases more gracefully ( http://www.imc.org/ietf-smtp/mail-archive/msg06633.html ). :-) Regards, -sm _______________________________________________ dnsext mailing list dnsext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext
- [dnsext] duplicate RRs and resulting RRSIG bert hubert
- Re: [dnsext] duplicate RRs and resulting RRSIG Mohan Parthasarathy
- Re: [dnsext] duplicate RRs and resulting RRSIG bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] duplicate RRs and resulting RRSIG bert hubert
- Re: [dnsext] duplicate RRs and resulting RRSIG Doug Barton
- Re: [dnsext] duplicate RRs and resulting RRSIG SM
- Re: [dnsext] duplicate RRs and resulting RRSIG Marco Davids (SIDN)
- Re: [dnsext] duplicate RRs and resulting RRSIG Tony Finch
- Re: [dnsext] duplicate RRs and resulting RRSIG Tony Finch