Re: [dnsext] [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates-18

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Thu, 21 June 2012 14:03 UTC

Return-Path: <dnsext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 668FD21F8692; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 07:03:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1340287396; bh=f2nT6asTwXgyFW0vREhHJJb5nGdqg53xi2WnJmsUqTM=; h=Date:From:To:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Cc: Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help: List-Subscribe:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=GvadacgWZIvExPlB6M0h4SWwVZrebt5lPfR2yQUANeIBjd7lgTu1rOOJbZLarENmO mpZiNTku5b3dux9GDyIF4IsrB8wVToSFEoKtLGHfLZ4hDinQYdmoxbia5wVnT/OWP0 jZtDsyfFbfW/l7GeenextW1gkZAyf+JOdlttdKAI=
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6646A21F8692; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 07:03:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fCOLPcNV0NnG; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 07:03:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.yitter.info (mail.yitter.info [208.86.224.201]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A95E21F8690; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 07:03:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from crankycanuck.ca (69-196-144-227.dsl.teksavvy.com [69.196.144.227]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 18F821ECB41D; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:03:09 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 10:03:01 -0400
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: Jiankang YAO <yaojk@cnnic.cn>
Message-ID: <20120621140301.GA42780@crankycanuck.ca>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20120522092115.0900a4a0@elandnews.com> <20120619023034.GJ32683@crankycanuck.ca> <9D782E7B4A4F42D5AB5B85C5D391B752@LENOVO47E041CF>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <9D782E7B4A4F42D5AB5B85C5D391B752@LENOVO47E041CF>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: dnsext@ietf.org, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, apps-discuss@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates-18
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org

On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 08:45:36PM +0800, Jiankang YAO wrote:
> He mean that this draft survives almost 7 years and the draft has not clear clue of being ready to be published before announcement of DNSEXT WG shutting down.

I see.  

With respect, I think I must have said about thirty times over the
past several years, "It is time to get this document published."  The
minutes from meetings at IETF 77 and IETF 78 both say that it seems
time to publish the document, just for example; I haven't even looked
at the list arhives.  SM was not an active participant in DNSEXT for
much of that time, so he might well have overlooked those previous
discussions.  Did you miss them also?

I will cheerfully accept responsibility for having failed to press
hard enough.  I nevertheless object to the characterization of "rush".
It's simply not true.  This document has been pursued in the most
leisurely way possible.

Best regards,

Andrew (as shepherd)

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com

_______________________________________________
dnsext mailing list
dnsext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext