Re: [dnsext] WGLC: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates-16

I support the publication of this document - finally. Any nits are just that - nits - and shouldn't affect the publication.  No changes, no take backs!

Mike

At 12:49 AM 1/20/2012, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
>Dear colleagues,
>
>This message initiates a three week Working Group Last Call on the
>document draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates-16.  LC will close on
>2012-01-11 at 00:00 UTC.
>
>The WG's standard conventions, which require five reviewers who state
>that they have read the draft and support its publication as a
>necessary but not sufficient determinant of rough consensus, are in
>force.  Please review the document and post to the list any comments
>you have before the close of LC.  If you cannot meet that deadline,
>but are willing to commit to completing a review and can give me a
>firm date for it (and that date is within a reasonable horizon), I
>will announce an extension of the LC deadline.  I'd appreciate it if
>you'd tell me of this need sooner rather than later.  Specific
>comments are much better than generic ones, and specific comments with
>suggested text (if you find some text wanting) are particularly
>encouraged.
>
>Speaking only personally, this draft is the product of several years
>of WG work: the -00 of the draft was submitted in 2005.  Moreover, it
>is the product of a lot of heated discussion and careful teasing out
>of the issues involved.  I would be sad to discover that we could not
>find (rather) more than five reviewers for this document.
>
>I will be the shepherd for this document if it is sent to the IESG.
>
>Best regards,
>
>Andrew
>
>-- 
>Andrew Sullivan
>ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
>_______________________________________________
>dnsext mailing list
>dnsext@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext

_______________________________________________
dnsext mailing list
dnsext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext