[dnsext] WGLC: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates-16

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Fri, 20 January 2012 05:49 UTC

Return-Path: <dnsext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F9D321F85BB; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 21:49:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1327038586; bh=hdfjZD+1Vo/1lll3ZTaTPlK4zO/u4Y2MNql6F3dbDng=; h=Date:From:To:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=FMRstukAoPl6bwfPnr2u6GDN35IxCW/m4vYdGH/o2VPGg7D+6Q6dgMz4WJxGKKjum t6mYOHbVIi/4jwfcoKA4U6yM0WOPyKXYUzDXYKS6iSMAJukbYjcWMwGr6BREz4a0In hnEGl0ZvB4z1dpd1Orjmk3u5TaSGdfOaPyOixsJE=
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E58B421F85BB for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 21:49:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LYWJqAT3Mebf for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 21:49:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.yitter.info (mail.yitter.info [208.86.224.201]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29DC221F85B7 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 21:49:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.yitter.info (unknown [100.44.91.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AF8321ECB420 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 05:49:41 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:49:39 -0500
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: dnsext@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20120120054939.GD4365@mail.yitter.info>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Subject: [dnsext] WGLC: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates-16
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org

Dear colleagues,

This message initiates a three week Working Group Last Call on the
document draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates-16.  LC will close on
2012-01-11 at 00:00 UTC.

The WG's standard conventions, which require five reviewers who state
that they have read the draft and support its publication as a
necessary but not sufficient determinant of rough consensus, are in
force.  Please review the document and post to the list any comments
you have before the close of LC.  If you cannot meet that deadline,
but are willing to commit to completing a review and can give me a
firm date for it (and that date is within a reasonable horizon), I
will announce an extension of the LC deadline.  I'd appreciate it if
you'd tell me of this need sooner rather than later.  Specific
comments are much better than generic ones, and specific comments with
suggested text (if you find some text wanting) are particularly
encouraged.

Speaking only personally, this draft is the product of several years
of WG work: the -00 of the draft was submitted in 2005.  Moreover, it
is the product of a lot of heated discussion and careful teasing out
of the issues involved.  I would be sad to discover that we could not
find (rather) more than five reviewers for this document.

I will be the shepherd for this document if it is sent to the IESG.

Best regards,

Andrew

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
_______________________________________________
dnsext mailing list
dnsext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext