[nasr] Re: [saag] Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up
Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Fri, 11 April 2025 16:51 UTC
Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: nasr@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: nasr@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60D071ACDE33 for <nasr@mail2.ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Apr 2025 09:51:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 93L8eI-I3ECp for <nasr@mail2.ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Apr 2025 09:51:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb2e.google.com (mail-yb1-xb2e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9450D1ACDE24 for <nasr@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Apr 2025 09:51:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb2e.google.com with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-e702cffe574so1817601276.3 for <nasr@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Apr 2025 09:51:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1744390297; x=1744995097; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=jkf/C0QiYRu2MIyBqFISsXSYeG8x0jk/NTllNpgqeVw=; b=Nz8HB4rKHlZXQ6eNVvJtyly2I0b9DgytzL5yfE85KOgX+f2P9oV4IQT9Zvnbqss5yI T//fkdFZHWhJKg3si5bWl0hjxqw05cIXFv+xbPAIXFG6I1cfaLSia1AiZtRdipTYydck 4kWnchoo8yjbNeJ/Y5SJ2pj3o7sq6dPPLRfoIvw9YvRdXYZBwd7vlX4i8APU2h4+gDsj Hh0+7X67qSh0PIDgutuG58YlbJg36qOA6RGVt+XSg6CIshj87alFtUOeMK3EDMiWYSxO QObfuwqhiH5oe8xbl57cDd4uoNGhk37J0c4W/DSDauOwxsCyf/WJWeSKJUBqp3U9Bxqq YStQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1744390297; x=1744995097; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=jkf/C0QiYRu2MIyBqFISsXSYeG8x0jk/NTllNpgqeVw=; b=rUZ0CA6y0p/2gMK/zGT5/R1GAmelXot4hx2Oa4ZgYrnVO46JPoGdIJZZ4SS9JDDsAS 1FstiZW74/v529lXN5wCZS6loKRj7k5Em7Ses5ZZOrKMCnSF+K+CAjNj7/4J4JFWEtA5 y4U9vCxjgANpC4QaXLpy5kaoRFsULMV4ou10TtMOM+f6CxO6weQOgUPDEziVXHwDb6J/ CpNluLPMTIcIY60ypDfk42fctnFIftJ3Sv1KA1NJGkeZ9iy4KOvzK891TvJmmuRpw5x1 0qqk66I07PPmpqUtlm5kdB0DcKZH4ZzskNpie2I0PszgsPz1wztAKz8+cnyOjhI0h85v Bl/Q==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCX3vZNbcI/dGW/bm9jIVrmBhSwweZr8z2MSlqXEEoGSS6V6KZc1zFE7LxyONlqsK5UigD3m@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwTmOt4Mu7chxwJm7PaJXrlawLLrtdwXHZbh1zMdJyofqO/dB+k eC/yHqac22NibkwbH1bzD9/jR/4KiZcAS46cj02H1D4vk2VBk3qjAWr7ZEFiuBbNUuCdHKR0F8T zyr55vx0Ql5mbxuKzIyVSrBR7m1hAjgi2L+Tvuw==
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncuOmpomhXHtoOQ//WsA7weT3K3PrEWHzdZy4ocqpf4ryZJvP9SwiX1McHk754+ CWyTKJBx/vGucxfJB9Oj9K91Mp+XtE0MuXh65hbxcnz2BpgzEJLXvM6GBx07jSlDFcDshgrrgnv K0B4zGwiGUEo2MUiAfPcdDsT/J
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE4RsM/o0M6+vxk12FoqW0XNeRKKW8Ms+zvCTXhLirKN7lEgDiH1OWHCF5pOijuypKuGjesVKbTrbVvpMcAjjg=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6902:2e0c:b0:e5d:b2d7:65b9 with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-e704dda4983mr5957140276.0.1744390297129; Fri, 11 Apr 2025 09:51:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <ef08bf0afa924713acc629dff8156761@huawei.com> <2025040312042771743841@chinamobile.com> <CAL02cgSg53nOB8BCSNCLGC78r41P_1VzBPoj2yOJP1qbS0jqfA@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBPFaJMsWyNozXS+osh251631vCStkrmOk=WQig5c1_0qw@mail.gmail.com> <87c61c52-839f-f66e-a66a-b737f01ca93f@ietf.contact> <CABcZeBMOvFXkQ2OFBpz2Ri5_Oz-pHGs=2fHvBNptOdjQy9F7ww@mail.gmail.com> <11730e71-f409-bbaf-9bc1-4f88d207bcab@ietf.contact> <CABcZeBMDg9cFGtf6AMwSiq3ZnZnrvwoAc7TjD0Ftq-JC8jWusQ@mail.gmail.com> <d3de69d6-f46b-fe0c-b6dc-8180864bd9b0@ietf.contact>
In-Reply-To: <d3de69d6-f46b-fe0c-b6dc-8180864bd9b0@ietf.contact>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 09:51:01 -0700
X-Gm-Features: ATxdqUGSdMMweSCssj8wdcO4uT9TprMUpt_MQCymiN1cCUe9gGAghB52zOaQYdo
Message-ID: <CABcZeBO15H=+ds0deqvtOzKvX+JvFzCn2pht3fcKYcp7df=UFw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Henk Birkholz <henk.birkholz@ietf.contact>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000002b8ce06328384e4"
Message-ID-Hash: JMD72EKXOZP6MDOKXMBOY6TL5RETJXD6
X-Message-ID-Hash: JMD72EKXOZP6MDOKXMBOY6TL5RETJXD6
X-MailFrom: ekr@rtfm.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>, Meiling Chen <chenmeiling@chinamobile.com>, "Liuchunchi(Peter)" <liuchunchi@huawei.com>, "nasr@ietf.org" <nasr@ietf.org>, IETF SAAG <saag@ietf.org>, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up
List-Id: Network Attestation for Secure Routing <nasr.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nasr/WzhgmWub9TCl5ms30jlLByA6mmU>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nasr>
List-Help: <mailto:nasr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:nasr-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:nasr@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:nasr-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:nasr-leave@ietf.org>
On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 9:45 AM Henk Birkholz <henk.birkholz@ietf.contact> wrote: > On 11.04.25 15:38, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 2:01 AM Henk Birkholz > > <henk.birkholz@ietf.contact> wrote: > > > > On 10.04.25 21:01, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 11:40 AM Henk Birkholz > > > <henk.birkholz@ietf.contact> wrote: > > > > > > On 03.04.25 21:11, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > > > > > > [0] Of course you could hash the individual configuration > > values, > > > > but this is much the same as publishing the configuration. > > > > > > Is it? I am curious why. > > > > > > > > > Because the values themselves are generally low entropy, so if you > > > publish their hashes, then it's generally easy to determine the > > preimage. > > > > > > -Ekr > > > > Would some salt help here (like the salted hashes in sd-cwt)? > > > > > > Probably not very much. What salt does is make it more difficult to > > amortize computation > > across multiple hashed values. However, if the total number of possible > > values > > is low (e.g., you have some configuration setting with 3 values) then > > you can > > just exhaustively search at query time. > > That makes a lot of sense - and might be another good reason not to put > these types of Claims into Evidence. I still think it is better to > include software components that provide the conveyance mechanism (e.g., > a YANG server with YANG Push capability) in a TCB and then use > successfully appraised software components for trusted telemetry to > convey such values for evaluation. That may be better from some angles but I think brings us back to Richard's question about whether operators are in fact willing to allow counterparties to access their devices to get this configuration data. It also doesn't affect--one way or the other--the need to understand which configuration directives are relevant and what acceptable values are. -Ekr
- [nasr] NASR BOF Follow-Up Liuchunchi(Peter)
- [nasr] Re: [saag] NASR BOF Follow-Up Meiling Chen
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Richard Barnes
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Eric Rescorla
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Michael Richardson
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: Re: Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Eric Rescorla
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: Re: Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Luigi IANNONE
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: Re: Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Meiling Chen
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: NASR BOF Fo… Liuchunchi(Peter)
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: Re: Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Henk Birkholz
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: Re: Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Eric Rescorla
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: Re: Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Toerless Eckert
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: Re: Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up 刘鹏辉
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: NASR BOF Fo… Watson Ladd
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: NASR BOF Fo… Toerless Eckert
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: Re: Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Liuchunchi(Peter)
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: Re: Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Eric Rescorla
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: Re: Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Henk Birkholz
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Henk Birkholz
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Eric Rescorla
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Henk Birkholz
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Eric Rescorla
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Henk Birkholz
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Eric Rescorla
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Henk Birkholz
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Eric Rescorla
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Henk Birkholz
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Eric Rescorla
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Toerless Eckert
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Eric Rescorla
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Liuchunchi(Peter)
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: Re: Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Watson Ladd
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: Re: Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Toerless Eckert
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: Re: Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Henk Birkholz
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: Re: Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Watson Ladd
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: Re: Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Toerless Eckert
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: Re: Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Henk Birkholz
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: Re: Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Watson Ladd
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: Re: Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Michael Richardson
- [nasr] Summary of Discussions So far---Re: [saag]… Meiling Chen
- [nasr] Re: Summary of Discussions So far---Re: [s… Luigi IANNONE
- [nasr] Re: Summary of Discussions So far---Re: [s… Meiling Chen
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: Re: Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Meiling Chen
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: Re: Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Watson Ladd
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: Re: Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Luigi IANNONE
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: Re: Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Eric Rescorla
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: Re: Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Meiling Chen
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: Re: Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Eric Rescorla
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: Re: Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Meiling Chen
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: Re: Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Eric Rescorla
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: NASR BOF Fo… Stephen Farrell
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: Re: Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Luigi IANNONE
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: Re: Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Eric Rescorla
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: Re: Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Luigi IANNONE
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: Re: Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Liuchunchi(Peter)
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Toerless Eckert
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Eric Rescorla
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Toerless Eckert
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Henk Birkholz
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Toerless Eckert
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Eric Rescorla
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Eric Rescorla
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Carsten Bormann
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Meiling Chen
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Richard Barnes
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Michael Richardson
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: Re: Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Henk Birkholz
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: Re: Re: NASR BOF Follow-Up Meiling Chen
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: NASR BOF Fo… Liuchunchi(Peter)
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: NASR BOF Fo… Eric Rescorla
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: NASR BOF Fo… Adrian Farrel
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: NASR BOF Fo… Luigi IANNONE
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: NASR BOF Fo… Meiling Chen
- [nasr] Re: [saag] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: NASR BOF Fo… Eric Rescorla