[nemo] New versions of charter

T.J. Kniveton <tj@kniveton.com> Mon, 15 May 2006 21:08 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FfkIk-00011q-Nk; Mon, 15 May 2006 17:08:26 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FfkIj-00011l-Bd for nemo@ietf.org; Mon, 15 May 2006 17:08:25 -0400
Received: from h-74-0-36-190.snfccasy.covad.net ([74.0.36.190] helo=multihop.net) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FfkIi-0004s7-1Q for nemo@ietf.org; Mon, 15 May 2006 17:08:25 -0400
Received: by deimos.multihop.net (Postfix, from userid 1013) id 9D9058AD163; Mon, 15 May 2006 14:08:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Spam-Score: -4.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on deimos.multihop.net
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DATE_IN_PAST_03_06 autolearn=ham version=3.1.1
Received: from [192.168.4.10] (wideload.tehama.multihop.net [192.168.4.10]) by deimos.multihop.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F21E08AD133 for <nemo@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 May 2006 14:08:22 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v750)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <EE44BD57-7721-4111-BEAB-837F3D13FDFB@kniveton.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; delsp="yes"; format="flowed"
To: ml-nemo WG <nemo@ietf.org>
From: "T.J. Kniveton" <tj@kniveton.com>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 11:00:28 -0700
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.750)
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 69a74e02bbee44ab4f8eafdbcedd94a1
Subject: [nemo] New versions of charter
X-BeenThere: nemo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: NEMO Working Group <nemo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nemo>, <mailto:nemo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:nemo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nemo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nemo>, <mailto:nemo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: nemo-bounces@ietf.org

I have posted a new version of the proposed charter (on the web page)  
to replace the April 30 version. Some of the changes include:

- Added some text about v6, v4 and v4/v6 solution distinctions.
- Added some additional text throughout the tasks/nontasks
- Added editing and typo fixes as suggested
- Other suggested changes

One remaining comment which I have not addressed yet:

James Kempf wrote:
> I am very much in favor of making WG charters very specific. It  
> helps to avoid ambiguity about what the WG is intending to  
> accomplish, and also helps focus the energy of the WG and avoid  
> having it become distracted by other proposals that tend to pop up,  
> until the originally promised work is completed. Therefore, I would  
> recommend that the charter include a bulleted list with three items  
> corresponding to each of these new drafts, with each item giving a  
> concise but complete description of what the promised draft is  
> intended to accomplish. If there are existing individual drafts  
> that cover these, the descriptions can be based on the individual  
> drafts. Also, it might be helpful to be more specific about the  
> goals and their timing. Rather than just a single goal, have a list  
> that correspond to the process: 00 WG draft selected by this time,  
> WG last call by this time, submission to IESG by this time.

(Some help would be appreciated with this one). I think we still have  
to adjust the milestones a bit more to make sure everything is  
explicitly spelled out. I have tried to make the charter as concrete  
as possible, while still short enough to be manageable/readable. I  
would like the next revision to focus on the milestones.

Can people please read this over and make comments/suggestions, with  
proposed text changes? That would be helpful.

Thanks,
TJ