Re: [nemo] New versions of charter

Vijay Devarapalli <vijay.devarapalli@azairenet.com> Tue, 16 May 2006 17:29 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fg3M1-0008Ey-Nz; Tue, 16 May 2006 13:29:05 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fg3M0-0008Et-NZ for nemo@ietf.org; Tue, 16 May 2006 13:29:04 -0400
Received: from mail1.azairenet.com ([66.92.223.4] helo=bart.corp.azairenet.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fg3Lx-0002uP-DH for nemo@ietf.org; Tue, 16 May 2006 13:29:04 -0400
Received: from [10.1.201.8] ([10.1.201.8]) by bart.corp.azairenet.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 16 May 2006 10:28:55 -0700
Message-ID: <446A0BD3.8090603@azairenet.com>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 10:28:51 -0700
From: Vijay Devarapalli <vijay.devarapalli@azairenet.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@motorola.com>
Subject: Re: [nemo] New versions of charter
References: <EE44BD57-7721-4111-BEAB-837F3D13FDFB@kniveton.com> <4468F985.6070108@azairenet.com> <4469A11A.3070509@motorola.com>
In-Reply-To: <4469A11A.3070509@motorola.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 May 2006 17:28:55.0279 (UTC) FILETIME=[3506F7F0:01C6790E]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 0bc60ec82efc80c84b8d02f4b0e4de22
Cc: ml-nemo WG <nemo@ietf.org>, "T.J. Kniveton" <tj@kniveton.com>
X-BeenThere: nemo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: NEMO Working Group <nemo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nemo>, <mailto:nemo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:nemo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nemo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nemo>, <mailto:nemo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: nemo-bounces@ietf.org

Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
> Vijay Devarapalli wrote:
>> hi TJ,
>>
>> my understanding was that there will also be a general purpose route 
>> optimization solution. and this solution would not depend on 
>> geographically distributed HAs. this is not mentioned anywhere in the
>>  charter. the charter only talks about "Analysis of the Solution
>> Space for Route Optimization".
>>
>>> The working group has work items to describe a basic solution for 
>>> network mobility in IPv6-only networks, and to design a mechanism to 
>>> allow mixed IPv4/IPv6 networks, carrying signalling messages that 
>>> describe both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and mobile network prefixes. 
>>> The latter task is shared with the Mobile IPv6 working group, 
>>> addressed by a joint design team.
>>
>> this is just DS-MIPv6 (with appropriate extensions for IPv4 mobile 
>> network prefixes), right? nothing more.
> 
> Maybe something more generic than just DS-MIPv6?  DS-MIPv6 addresses
> some relevant transition cases but not all (HA fully-v6 is not addressed).

well, thats what I was asking TJ. if DS-MIPv6 is
what the chairs have in mind for this or it is
something more.

Vijay