RE: [nemo] RE: draft-ietf-nemo-home-network-models-05

"Pascal Thubert \(pthubert\)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Tue, 14 February 2006 15:42 UTC

Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1F92KN-0004A9-KQ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 10:42:55 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1F92KM-00049a-8R for nemo@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 10:42:54 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA05941 for <nemo@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 10:41:08 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com ([144.254.224.140]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F92YB-0006D8-JJ for nemo@ietf.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 10:57:12 -0500
Received: from ams-core-1.cisco.com ([144.254.224.150]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 Feb 2006 16:42:43 +0100
Received: from xbh-ams-331.emea.cisco.com (xbh-ams-331.cisco.com [144.254.231.71]) by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id k1EFgL5w022014; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:42:38 +0100 (MET)
Received: from xmb-ams-337.cisco.com ([144.254.231.82]) by xbh-ams-331.emea.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:42:36 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [nemo] RE: draft-ietf-nemo-home-network-models-05
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:42:31 +0100
Message-ID: <7892795E1A87F04CADFCCF41FADD00FC01D297BA@xmb-ams-337.emea.cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [nemo] RE: draft-ietf-nemo-home-network-models-05
Thread-Index: AcYxfJ248xfD90KvTlGbPNRYf/9U2gAAFyPQ
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@motorola.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Feb 2006 15:42:36.0906 (UTC) FILETIME=[47A13CA0:01C6317D]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: cf4fa59384e76e63313391b70cd0dd25
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: nemo@ietf.org, tj@kniveton.com, "Mattias Pettersson L \\(LD/EAB\\)" <mattias.l.pettersson@ericsson.com>, Margaret Wasserman <MRW@devicescape.com>, vijay.devarapalli@nokia.com, ryuji@sfc.wide.ad.jp, ernst@sfc.wide.ad.jp
X-BeenThere: nemo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: NEMO Working Group <nemo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nemo>, <mailto:nemo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:nemo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nemo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nemo>, <mailto:nemo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: nemo-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: nemo-bounces@ietf.org

>
>> Note that NEMO does not require autoconf operations; and last that I
>>  know, a Cisco router will not auto-configure an address on a prefix
>>  that is shorter than 64.
>
>You seem to imply that a router _will_ auto-configure an address from
an
>RA with prefix /64.  YEs?  A "router" fixed or mobile shouldn't
>statelessly auto-configure an IPv6 address at all, be it prefix /64 or
>shorter, no?
>
[Pascal] Alex, the Mobile Router needs to auto-configure an address on
its egress interface as it roams... 

Pascal