IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nemo] RE: draft-ietf-nemo-home-network-models-05

Thierry Ernst <ernst@sfc.wide.ad.jp> Wed, 15 February 2006 03:12 UTC

Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1F9D5l-0001RS-1W; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 22:12:33 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1F9D5j-0001RE-D0 for nemo@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 22:12:31 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA00038 for <nemo@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 22:10:43 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mail.sfc.wide.ad.jp ([203.178.142.146]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F9DJf-0006kR-BY for nemo@ietf.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 22:26:56 -0500
Received: from iseran.local (unknown [IPv6:2001:200:0:8410:20a:95ff:fed0:2c78]) by mail.sfc.wide.ad.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 879BC4C7C2; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 12:12:17 +0900 (JST)
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 12:12:22 +0900
From: Thierry Ernst <ernst@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
To: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@motorola.com>
Subject: Re: [nemo] RE: draft-ietf-nemo-home-network-models-05
Message-Id: <20060215121222.1dc6385f.ernst@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
In-Reply-To: <43F20601.1040705@motorola.com>
References: <7892795E1A87F04CADFCCF41FADD00FC01D297BA@xmb-ams-337.emea.cisco.com> <43F20601.1040705@motorola.com>
Organization: Keio University
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; powerpc-apple-darwin7.8.0)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: ffa9dfbbe7cc58b3fa6b8ae3e57b0aa3
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: nemo@ietf.org, pthubert@cisco.com, Ryuji Wakikawa <ryuji@sfc.wide.ad.jp>, mattias.l.pettersson@ericsson.com
X-BeenThere: nemo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: NEMO Working Group <nemo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nemo>, <mailto:nemo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:nemo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nemo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nemo>, <mailto:nemo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: nemo-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: nemo-bounces@ietf.org

> What stays clear to me about the aggregated mode is the following.
> 
> The aggregated mode is something not supported by RFC3963 because 
> RFC3963 works when the Home Address is derived from the prefix on the 
> home link.

According to me, this is not so clear. RFC 3963 is a result of merging
several ideas, including the idea from Ryuji that the MR's HoA can be
taken from the MNP. This said, I don't have the technical deepth that
you have to evaluate if RFC 3963 allow it ort not. 

So, I cced Ryuji regarding this point.

> draft-ietf-nemo-home-network-models-xx.txt:
> "it makes sense for a Mobile Router to register using a Home Address
>   from one of its own MNPs."
> 
> No, it makes no sense.

Well, to Alex it may not make sense. But it makes some sense for other
authors of RFC 3963.

> Otherwise I agree with you.

Thierry.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email