IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: [nemo] NEMOv4 vs DS-MIPv6

"Soliman, Hesham" <hsoliman@qualcomm.com> Thu, 11 May 2006 17:48 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FeFGl-0000Of-Vw; Thu, 11 May 2006 13:48:11 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FeFGk-0000Oa-Ie for nemo@ietf.org; Thu, 11 May 2006 13:48:10 -0400
Received: from ithilien.qualcomm.com ([129.46.51.59]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FeFGj-0004jt-8M for nemo@ietf.org; Thu, 11 May 2006 13:48:10 -0400
Received: from crowley.qualcomm.com (crowley.qualcomm.com [129.46.61.151]) by ithilien.qualcomm.com (8.13.6/8.12.5/1.0) with ESMTP id k4BHlxRL022901 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 11 May 2006 10:48:01 -0700
Received: from NAEXBR04.na.qualcomm.com (naexbr04.qualcomm.com [10.46.141.42]) by crowley.qualcomm.com (8.13.6/8.12.5/1.0) with ESMTP id k4BHlrJF016156; Thu, 11 May 2006 10:47:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAEX06.na.qualcomm.com ([129.46.135.160]) by NAEXBR04.na.qualcomm.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 11 May 2006 10:47:53 -0700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [nemo] NEMOv4 vs DS-MIPv6
Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 10:47:52 -0700
Message-ID: <1487A357FD2ED544B8AD29E528FF9DF00284A0ED@NAEX06.na.qualcomm.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [nemo] NEMOv4 vs DS-MIPv6
Thread-Index: AcZ013crDnW5+tlVShazHcuOap3DPAAS3x3w
From: "Soliman, Hesham" <hsoliman@qualcomm.com>
To: Keiichi SHIMA <keiichi@iijlab.net>, alexandru.petrescu@motorola.com
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 May 2006 17:47:53.0856 (UTC) FILETIME=[079B4800:01C67523]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 39bd8f8cbb76cae18b7e23f7cf6b2b9f
Cc: nemo@ietf.org, thierry.ernst@inria.fr, henrik@levkowetz.com
X-BeenThere: nemo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: NEMO Working Group <nemo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nemo>, <mailto:nemo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:nemo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nemo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nemo>, <mailto:nemo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: nemo-bounces@ietf.org

 
 > > Tsirtsis, George wrote:
 > > > P.S.: BTW, Hesham is telling me that DS-MIPv6 spec does 
 > support IPv4 
 > > > prefixes
 > > 
 > > ... where?  The draft only says MR should attach a 
 > prefixlen on the v4
 > > HoA in a IPv4 hoa option.  Is there a way to communicate 
 > v4 MNPs that
 > > are not related to the HoA?  Is it possible to specify 
 > several v4 MNPs?
 > 
 > I think I raised the feature in the Vancouver meeting and I believe
 > authors incorporated the function to carry multiple v4pfxes 
 > in the draft.
 > 
 > The issue 57 is that proposal I raised, and it seems it had 
 > been accepted.
 >  
 > Maybe a short status report of this topic from the authors make your
 > question clear.

=> What Keiichi said is correct. We included this based on his comments.


Hesham

 > 
 > ---
 > Keiichi SHIMA
 > IIJ Research Laboratory <keiichi@iijlab.net>
 > WIDE Project <shima@wide.ad.jp>
 > 
 > 
 >

v2.43.4 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status