Re: [nemo] NEMOv4 vs DS-MIPv6
Vijay Devarapalli <vijay.devarapalli@azairenet.com> Thu, 11 May 2006 19:19 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FeGgi-0007Q5-BI; Thu, 11 May 2006 15:19:04 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FeGgh-0007Q0-Sa for nemo@ietf.org; Thu, 11 May 2006 15:19:03 -0400
Received: from mail1.azairenet.com ([66.92.223.4] helo=bart.corp.azairenet.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FeGgg-0000V4-JS for nemo@ietf.org; Thu, 11 May 2006 15:19:03 -0400
Received: from [10.1.201.13] ([10.1.201.13]) by bart.corp.azairenet.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 11 May 2006 12:18:59 -0700
Message-ID: <44638E22.7070606@azairenet.com>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 12:18:58 -0700
From: Vijay Devarapalli <vijay.devarapalli@azairenet.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@motorola.com>
Subject: Re: [nemo] NEMOv4 vs DS-MIPv6
References: <1487A357FD2ED544B8AD29E528FF9DF00284A193@NAEX06.na.qualcomm.com> <44638A03.4060905@motorola.com>
In-Reply-To: <44638A03.4060905@motorola.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 May 2006 19:18:59.0973 (UTC) FILETIME=[C1AA8B50:01C6752F]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 93238566e09e6e262849b4f805833007
Cc: nemo@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: nemo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: NEMO Working Group <nemo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nemo>, <mailto:nemo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:nemo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nemo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nemo>, <mailto:nemo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: nemo-bounces@ietf.org
Alexandru Petrescu wrote: > I suggest using IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses in the Prefix Table whenever > the HoA of MR is an IPv4 HoA (and not simple 32bit IPv4 addresses in the > NEMOv6 Prefix Table). I am not sure though about the IPv4 MNP. There > seems to be no specification about how to use an IPv4 prefix in the > v4-mapped v6 form, I've checked rfc4038 (app aspects of v6 trans) and > 4291 (v6 addr arch). > > The confusion that may arise representing a v4 MNP in v4-mapped form is > illustrated by the following two representations saying same thing but > written completely differently: ::ffff:1.0.0.0/8 > ::ffff:1.0.0.0/102. > The 8bits plen is from the v4 prefix, and 102bits plen is a v6 plen. > > So, because of this IPv4 MNP issue I don't know what to put in the > DS-MIPv6 Prefix Table. > > Any idea? we can extend the definition of Prefix Table to include IPv4 mobile network prefixes in addition to IPv6 mobile network prefixes. that would be the simplest. Vijay
- RE: [nemo] NEMOv4 vs DS-MIPv6 Soliman, Hesham
- RE: [nemo] NEMOv4 vs DS-MIPv6 Tsirtsis, George
- Re: [nemo] NEMOv4 vs DS-MIPv6 Henrik Levkowetz
- RE: [nemo] NEMOv4 vs DS-MIPv6 Tsirtsis, George
- Re: [nemo] NEMOv4 vs DS-MIPv6 Henrik Levkowetz
- RE: [nemo] NEMOv4 vs DS-MIPv6 Narayanan, Vidya
- Re: [nemo] NEMOv4 vs DS-MIPv6 Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [nemo] NEMOv4 vs DS-MIPv6 Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [nemo] NEMOv4 vs DS-MIPv6 Keiichi SHIMA
- Re: [nemo] NEMOv4 vs DS-MIPv6 Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [nemo] NEMOv4 vs DS-MIPv6 Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [nemo] NEMOv4 vs DS-MIPv6 Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [nemo] NEMOv4 vs DS-MIPv6 Keiichi SHIMA
- Re: DS-MIPv6 technicals (waS: [nemo] NEMOv4 vs DS… Alexandru Petrescu
- [nemo] Re: DS-MIPv6 technicals Keiichi SHIMA
- [nemo] Re: DS-MIPv6 technicals Alexandru Petrescu
- RE: [nemo] NEMOv4 vs DS-MIPv6 Soliman, Hesham
- Re: [nemo] NEMOv4 vs DS-MIPv6 Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [nemo] NEMOv4 vs DS-MIPv6 Alexandru Petrescu
- RE: [nemo] NEMOv4 vs DS-MIPv6 Soliman, Hesham
- Re: [nemo] NEMOv4 vs DS-MIPv6 Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [nemo] NEMOv4 vs DS-MIPv6 Vijay Devarapalli
- Re: [nemo] NEMOv4 vs DS-MIPv6 Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [nemo] NEMOv4 vs DS-MIPv6 Keiichi SHIMA
- Re: [nemo] NEMOv4 vs DS-MIPv6 Alexandru Petrescu