IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: [nemo] Update on MIRON I-D (draft-bernardos-nemo-miron-01.txt)

"Ivancic, William D. (GRC-RCN0)" <william.d.ivancic@nasa.gov> Mon, 09 July 2007 18:11 UTC

Return-path: <nemo-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I7xhP-0000GV-G6; Mon, 09 Jul 2007 14:11:03 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I7xhN-0000GK-WC for nemo@ietf.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2007 14:11:02 -0400
Received: from ndjsbar02.ndc.nasa.gov ([198.120.25.39]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I7xhJ-0007yQ-0H for nemo@ietf.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2007 14:11:01 -0400
Received: from ndjsxgw01.ndc.nasa.gov (ndjsxgw01.ndc.nasa.gov [129.166.32.111]) by ndjsbar02.ndc.nasa.gov (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id CBEAA29A0DB; Mon, 9 Jul 2007 13:10:55 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from NDJSEVS23A.ndc.nasa.gov ([129.166.32.223]) by ndjsxgw01.ndc.nasa.gov with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 9 Jul 2007 13:10:55 -0500
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: RE: [nemo] Update on MIRON I-D (draft-bernardos-nemo-miron-01.txt)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="sha1"; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; boundary="--=_NextPart_DJD_480474928.141052765"
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 13:10:53 -0500
Message-ID: <A3A356E39B867E4380966B0EB600C28F2D91BF@NDJSEVS23A.ndc.nasa.gov>
In-Reply-To: <1183973592.5652.21.camel@localhost>
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [nemo] Update on MIRON I-D (draft-bernardos-nemo-miron-01.txt)
Thread-Index: AcfCDFV/GWZe/6jWRDSFTFiNdB0TfwARueng
References: <1183973592.5652.21.camel@localhost>
From: "Ivancic, William D. (GRC-RCN0)" <william.d.ivancic@nasa.gov>
To: cjbc@it.uc3m.es, IETF NEMO WG <nemo@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Jul 2007 18:10:55.0590 (UTC) FILETIME=[7E552860:01C7C254]
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 72dbfff5c6b8ad2b1b727c13be042129
Cc: Marcelo Bagnulo <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>, María Calderón <maria@it.uc3m.es>, Ignacio Soto Campos <isoto@it.uc3m.es>
X-BeenThere: nemo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: NEMO Working Group <nemo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nemo>, <mailto:nemo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:nemo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nemo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nemo>, <mailto:nemo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: nemo-bounces@ietf.org

Carlos,

I have a couple of questions regarding MIRON.

How does allowing the MR to proxy for LNNs scale? 

Does allowing the MR to proxy for LNNs result in binding update storms during network transisions?

How does this work in a multi-homed mobile network?  (Perhaps a monami6 related questions, but monami6, nemo and mip6 will soon be combined.)

How does allowing the MR to proxy for LNNs effect Ipsec traffic between LNNs and CNs?

The draft indicates code was tested in some sort of test network.  Are there any papers or links to results.  I am interested in how many LNNs and CNs were used in the test deployment.


Will

******************************
William D. Ivancic
Phone 216-433-3494
Fax 216-433-8705
Lab 216-433-2620
Mobile 440-503-4892
http://roland.grc.nasa.gov/~ivancic 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano [mailto:cjbc@it.uc3m.es] 
> Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 5:33 AM
> To: IETF NEMO WG
> Cc: Marcelo Bagnulo; María Calderón; Ignacio Soto Campos
> Subject: [nemo] Update on MIRON I-D 
> (draft-bernardos-nemo-miron-01.txt)
> 
> Hi,
> 
> 	We've just submitted an update of the I-D that 
> describes or NEMO RO
> proposal: MIRON (MIPv6 Route Optimisation for NEMO). Until it 
> appears on the I-D repository, it can be downloaded from the 
> following location:
> 
> http://www.it.uc3m.es/cjbc/papers/draft-bernardos-nemo-miron-01.txt
> 
>.....

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email