Re: [netconf] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-notif-13: (with COMMENT)

"Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <rrahman@cisco.com> Mon, 13 May 2019 17:57 UTC

Return-Path: <rrahman@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 308F712001E; Mon, 13 May 2019 10:57:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=EZmFODsg; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=PxUNvvL4
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pzd4Pwx2gpdG; Mon, 13 May 2019 10:57:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D4F212023C; Mon, 13 May 2019 10:57:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2726; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1557770251; x=1558979851; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=+mGJn7DcQj/QkrxzNd4Tqt1TDByKWibNuJ8P6QH8tEY=; b=EZmFODsgq5O2XhqhvZhFuTqrc2dWXYJoqSSxlk/2lmi8g+yaSVIdj4fR WnNXDOCt2FE6Ycxbll8SH4du3PWyliiTFoiMmksVCpSNa3SvXhsW3p2OO A22ZxWIFuxOKGF9A4Q1JLjZ8LkWlv9+YagunqgDgVNtgMNf+vj0t3yLhG Q=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:LK5XOxyLDs6OB93XCy+N+z0EezQntrPoPwUc9psgjfdUf7+++4j5YhSN/u1j2VnOW4iTq+lJjebbqejBYSQB+t7A1RJKa5lQT1kAgMQSkRYnBZufE0T7KffsRyc7B89FElRi+iLzPA==
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AJBgACr9lc/5JdJa1kH4F4gT5QA2lVIAQLKIQRg0cDjn6CMpdKgS4UgRADVAkBAQEMAQEjCgIBAYRAAheBfCM0CQ4BAwEBBAEBAgEEbRwMhUsCBBIREQwBATcBDwIBCBoCCR0CAgIwFQULAgQBDQUigwABgWoDHQEOoQYCgTWIX3GBL4J5AQEFgUZBgn4Ygg8DBoELKItPF4FAP4ERJwwTgkw+gmECAQIBgSoBEgEfF4JzMoImin8kgjuZHF8JAoIJhiCEOYQxg1IbghOGTI0NgxOJH4EihTSOMAIEAgQFAg4BAQWBTzgpPVgRCHAVZQGCQYJGgziFFIU/cgGBKIwjgkMBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,465,1549929600"; d="scan'208";a="274873557"
Received: from rcdn-core-10.cisco.com ([173.37.93.146]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 13 May 2019 17:57:30 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-015.cisco.com (xch-aln-015.cisco.com [173.36.7.25]) by rcdn-core-10.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x4DHvULb017000 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 13 May 2019 17:57:30 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) by XCH-ALN-015.cisco.com (173.36.7.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Mon, 13 May 2019 12:57:29 -0500
Received: from xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) by xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Mon, 13 May 2019 13:57:13 -0400
Received: from NAM03-DM3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 13 May 2019 13:57:13 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-cisco-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=+mGJn7DcQj/QkrxzNd4Tqt1TDByKWibNuJ8P6QH8tEY=; b=PxUNvvL46T6oAfRgz5qlNqGkDhPG9EBR0z1EIPG3SQ1ZPs1/wa8X6OPKOC44we0HPEjV0QpbqOs8Z7WwF16Eti6PI60PBnGr32dy3PvY+WONCOiEYNExnHr0dATIlIaXXOIPxAfs1rh3NOnpnaZO31peymUg58cQnMeQwwasv1M=
Received: from DM5PR1101MB2105.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.174.104.151) by DM5PR1101MB2169.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.174.104.142) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1878.22; Mon, 13 May 2019 17:57:12 +0000
Received: from DM5PR1101MB2105.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::6ce2:350d:6bed:7dde]) by DM5PR1101MB2105.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::6ce2:350d:6bed:7dde%2]) with mapi id 15.20.1878.024; Mon, 13 May 2019 17:57:12 +0000
From: "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <rrahman@cisco.com>
To: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-notif@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-notif@ietf.org>, Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>, "netconf-chairs@ietf.org" <netconf-chairs@ietf.org>, "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-notif-13: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHVCaVdp/OKn2KY1kmBszDth6Cp96ZpFDqA
Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 17:57:12 +0000
Message-ID: <6AA3C49F-28F9-43A3-9712-CF3CB26102EA@cisco.com>
References: <155776336478.23641.7579515397254467186.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <155776336478.23641.7579515397254467186.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.10.6.190114
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=rrahman@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:2840:1250:2421:2f0a:1dbc:638e]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: a6b9eadb-af08-415b-530d-08d6d7cc6d33
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600141)(711020)(4605104)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:DM5PR1101MB2169;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM5PR1101MB2169:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 2
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM5PR1101MB2169CE33B4C2CD34BFD3A8F4AB0F0@DM5PR1101MB2169.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 0036736630
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(366004)(396003)(39860400002)(136003)(376002)(346002)(199004)(189003)(14454004)(46003)(446003)(11346002)(486006)(476003)(83716004)(186003)(966005)(2616005)(102836004)(6506007)(6246003)(71200400001)(71190400001)(305945005)(7736002)(224303003)(76176011)(99286004)(478600001)(81166006)(81156014)(66574012)(8936002)(53936002)(110136005)(25786009)(68736007)(82746002)(54906003)(5660300002)(256004)(14444005)(4326008)(6116002)(36756003)(6306002)(58126008)(6512007)(6486002)(6436002)(229853002)(86362001)(66946007)(2906002)(66476007)(66556008)(64756008)(66446008)(33656002)(316002)(73956011)(91956017)(76116006); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:DM5PR1101MB2169; H:DM5PR1101MB2105.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: XpyaNw8PzdQw+EmgcBmSe7sw3sw8pi/hbXWnl5Wtqce//L3SuzpGXCXpAU43LqPSI1mutj5W9wmyQNx6Qzd4l++7GvC338Ji5kfGRN1wD482P49sKzVZKwYbjAm4eb2nmkcNlV/9RejTmvBFYUL1rVHeizPtWLjXBrpLriSSqK2Jf0ci3PcO7yrn0bmiWaDjbk8TlB7//U3+EHYlFAwM5nPkq1K9PhmTmSY66xsdBELjkWg8uZobgGUMP1NyVy+5P8Oyb2RcjOTMG1Lxqt2QEgXU1/jMPSY6qQsyDIuvBeIyCn6P4W1eB3GSbG/YjvAFmQFeDMG6el9vUqFjK930ru3w9aUhnszhK87tKiKzSAYr+ygmRID2K3w/pgaKa7rfh1yymLC8BD7ATm+XNzSWBGzkZLyBVZmYbuSxeE7FyCs=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <570D703ED4B8C646B30D96906ED80DB6@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: a6b9eadb-af08-415b-530d-08d6d7cc6d33
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 13 May 2019 17:57:12.3112 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM5PR1101MB2169
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.25, xch-aln-015.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-10.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/0tAPTKqjbDe_hxlRFWskJq1N4Ao>
Subject: Re: [netconf] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-notif-13: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 17:57:35 -0000


Hi,

Thank you for your review. Please see inline.


On 2019-05-13, 12:03 PM, "Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker" <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:

    Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
    draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-notif-13: No Objection
    
    When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
    email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
    introductory paragraph, however.)
    
    
    Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
    for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
    
    
    The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-notif/
    
    
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    COMMENT:
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    One question (and this is probably just because of my lack of detailed
    knowledge about RESTCONF):
    
    Sec 4 says: "To meet subscription quality of service promises, the publisher
    MUST
       take any existing subscription "dscp" and apply it to the DSCP
       marking in the IP header."
    What does "existing subscription "dscp"" mean here?
This is referring to the "dscp" leaf node in draft-ietf-netconf-subscribed-notifications. But as Benjamin pointed out, we will be removing this section from this draft since the text got added to subscribed-notifications.

    
    Related update: please also consider the comment from the TSV-ART review about
    the example DSCP value (Thanks Wes!). I actually would also appreciate to add a
    comment that this is an internal value that depends on the network
    configuration (in order to avoid that people just randomly copy this example
    value and suddenly always use 10)!
Noted.

Regards,
Reshad.