IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netconf] Bulk <rpc-reply>

aruna potti <arunapotti@gmail.com> Tue, 03 March 2020 16:15 UTC

Return-Path: <arunapotti@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93ED63A232F for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 08:15:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pi1NRUjGY-bq for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 08:15:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52d.google.com (mail-ed1-x52d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44DD73A232A for <netconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 08:15:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52d.google.com with SMTP id c62so5166404edf.0 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 03 Mar 2020 08:15:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=myzmqu6X3Wm9F7zu5aOmhIkOGYZV1bhf0tIM+qxPERM=; b=L9q1Tc+iXsLRngDNCJvQoaAMBnBa40GxvY87PVjae2t/sqk8HNZWfd3OnN8n1R6muS DJFfh7Ed8Cx6WeUG4Liqqs0AttA80pW4jmt6x4jifmGoXv+n6EjRNnzFOPaxplIQyf/b 7ewwcXrMgpszIOgxV8SatttLLUaouc7PmKNR3M8kih486Y89SfY7KkkQ0vAqvMqn7enQ adHz5TOIXVd5+BtyGAEb7pyBL/Vnvm6IQWVB5SP7P+T6RCYQYkYHnqN0Qo2BcNINOf+1 IoC46LSIi89jE4XVW34pRv40pUhkWIMLiMbXU1iyNxSi5PxXT2LOzpxDDwTqHsO5Dvwp AEQw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=myzmqu6X3Wm9F7zu5aOmhIkOGYZV1bhf0tIM+qxPERM=; b=tT9dgFEJIw/nExwViTDtNT02rX6hRgVeTKScxNGM9drsHtIcRAECab+lK+SbrUB/MQ noKriA+5NpCub9WcAAK/BvkqnWJohX9pL3RLKJhYTDHZM91Ay2MVdHOZ/BITTK+NDbrQ Zf3QYZwDaCQihOvj+meIpOeMsvpsws91fqc9vk2xEt7ARDYBUZ6L3Me4CJyEXM5ch5fG fSipv+U9gWYq1ogxAsrS0ZAAhn0rBTgfYD2Dm89kllW42TAeZnTFSztsfCv3kbxwyhVs +upf9ZphOfvP/vcf6roIntho1j4L43SaQ0O6SlhD2Y61if3t5QCexudO9fATQDv5V8pP H3uQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ2M+FhEB7hfulAbebomJSQbUJiBHaPzTyBh2dZiV9y+tgBDTOk9 KiRz8khcLA7KBxnJdVhFclLvC+L/W8t9X0QpkYQm+w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vt3W9YZ3MT1WwAIh9iPFtFG1zq1o1wQNhUf052KA1Svxcekte1U/szQWNAGms8tlIxAbcNAqvPT8UpHKBWYy5k=
X-Received: by 2002:a50:9b19:: with SMTP id o25mr4685149edi.314.1583252101481; Tue, 03 Mar 2020 08:15:01 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CACpTNnZ1UeihokYrhP2Gtb18j_DYq9tSDrt8pAzn_9yF4n_OOg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACpTNnZ1UeihokYrhP2Gtb18j_DYq9tSDrt8pAzn_9yF4n_OOg@mail.gmail.com>
From: aruna potti <arunapotti@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2020 08:14:50 -0800
Message-ID: <CACpTNnZH-whG0QrOSvfP3O2jNN-AcYUtUNk7mizimkVrwbUsSA@mail.gmail.com>
To: netconf@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000194f31059ff59bbb"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/1-Evola2RLC7eImj_xF6O4ATebA>
Subject: Re: [netconf] Bulk <rpc-reply>
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2020 16:15:07 -0000

Hi,
A gentle reminder of my question!

Thanks,


On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 12:19 PM aruna potti <arunapotti@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Is there any conclusion on the proposals mentioned below?
> https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-liu-netconf-multiple-replies-01.html
>
> I am especially interested in how clients can deal with bulk <rpc-reply>
> as they can not wait forever for a response and usually require to have
> time out for a response from the device. I see an issue to increase the
> time out as it can interfere with the network communication issue detection
> while waiting for the response.
> What is your suggestion on how a client should handle the bulk <rpc-reply>?
>
> Thanks,
> Aruna.
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email