[netconf] one edit-config with bulk edits
aruna potti <arunapotti@gmail.com> Tue, 03 March 2020 16:37 UTC
Return-Path: <arunapotti@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ED5A3A238C for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 08:37:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9VSs2wK42oJB for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 08:37:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52a.google.com (mail-ed1-x52a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 147383A2389 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 08:37:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52a.google.com with SMTP id dm3so5213881edb.1 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 03 Mar 2020 08:37:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Oc6lltruU+lMrcDpKa42hJQLyChKm6kdCfNK0pCw7a0=; b=R4sIFlZOctH5iT61S2f1VrpA3i8XqzFpZIHAUKlo4e0PgxZlCLcq0seyIarGfhnVSa 2YjLFCcTXE5O8xaIPtwtGCC6BrwmEjuJrU7VtxBqKK140cDUJNkpETxRaUW8dvBXw9JN t38ueuijqbk9eZ1+lC5iOigcN3C7egbArEOJlvMic408o5GMEBTJPEcc7PwOpq3PMc8F otPQWUPKVivU6jHi65eqM73ng9cZYGfbVLlaKYZ0oQxtUZATdvF94yvg8KnaQibWL3ZT GjOXm/ZqLkT3ZCWvFk1riaahUG3thUxQ4N1v9Ai0pp01utYz03ZmiJYIh6KK58KVkqlU sj8g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Oc6lltruU+lMrcDpKa42hJQLyChKm6kdCfNK0pCw7a0=; b=XGmJrH2b74+7fIfGPZM0MfBYGwtrfY2ZmV1XH0kQVWLv5dILR2PtNUA6telx19g1Wy KKy9C2O05J4USGNOfcbP6Hm8FoICfTQhcD5RumGC6hHX9v4+yBKo9KPTSMjUB4eCc/td 1k64NjKH0lNKLaK1cu9ziSi/XHnYD42CW33jdVBIDdoHjUJvM3yiFGfZU0m990Dai73I yTerLpZY+i+hyNPw5lLQUSbpUOYHcy1WKHbcpJyt+1qNO3AV7wsc7SEikvtDG0MV5QfW M5WrMPSMgHXMDf5PYz/gZDL6W8i3ZR/XCpFk81FDJmIUe/rLX3h12Nr43hiMFZoj94BK 14lw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ0CRj2xATb4U05g2MURkloCXXIH49hEiCimJrb7DlOY3gvl7D2+ SpQW6skCjLgQPjOVDm/Ez3DEePVgdb1/BTI0NRcm2OyY
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vtaLssoOXAInP7qv1h72x4CLK8Kje+vmNtB3SmMEe5h7QHijTqAYgQQG0D874Pk2XrI3hAmglw9W6zELTY5nW8=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1e12:: with SMTP id g18mr4350325ejj.309.1583253428162; Tue, 03 Mar 2020 08:37:08 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: aruna potti <arunapotti@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2020 08:36:56 -0800
Message-ID: <CACpTNnYY4Uk26pPfgQ_vv=2A2+Ham7A9g+imBsXuGE_n7y65=Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: netconf@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002cd452059ff5eaa6"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/XMCZS1ligRKhxpi7eJFQdfRdBI0>
Subject: [netconf] one edit-config with bulk edits
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2020 16:37:11 -0000
Hi, We have a requirement to use one edit-config to send around 400 edit operations so that we can make use of "rollback-on-error " capability to go back to the previous state in case of errors. Is there any limit on the number of edit operations that can be combined to send in one edit-config? Thanks,
- [netconf] one edit-config with bulk edits aruna potti
- Re: [netconf] one edit-config with bulk edits Kent Watsen