Re: [Netconf] WGLC on restconf-notif-08

Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> Thu, 25 October 2018 13:29 UTC

Return-Path: <mbj@tail-f.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C133A130E3D for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 06:29:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nlqcX3Vsw_bY for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 06:29:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.tail-f.com (mail.tail-f.com [46.21.102.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBA8C128C65 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 06:29:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [173.38.220.43]) by mail.tail-f.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 796B91AE0365; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 15:29:46 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 15:29:45 +0200
Message-Id: <20181025.152945.1091370192742338773.mbj@tail-f.com>
To: rrahman@cisco.com
Cc: kwatsen@juniper.net, netconf@ietf.org
From: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <ECF2B40C-AE54-4310-84AA-E6678FE24A55@cisco.com>
References: <A19424BA-7F59-4B5B-96EB-635AFB217309@juniper.net> <20181025.085820.439553379534542406.mbj@tail-f.com> <ECF2B40C-AE54-4310-84AA-E6678FE24A55@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/2TsB0EuB6BoMf3QPpYAmopoRW0I>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] WGLC on restconf-notif-08
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 13:29:50 -0000

"Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <rrahman@cisco.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> By Juergen's proposal are you referring to new xpath/ypath definition
> for context-independent encoding in 6991bis? And SN should wait for
> 6991bis?

No I meant that SN would adopt Juergen's proposal.  This can be done
today.


/martin



> If so, why not go with Martin's alternative A?
> 
> What do we do about existing drafts/RFCs which use yang:xpath1.0? I
> don't know how many there are (only one which comes to mind is
> schema-mount).
> 
> FYI, looks like this issue was brought up a few years ago.
> https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/current/msg12906.html
> 
> Regards,
> Reshad.
> 
> On 2018-10-25, 2:58 AM, "Martin Bjorklund" <mbj@tail-f.com> wrote:
> 
>     Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net> wrote:
>     > 
>     > > Since this is an existing issue (not caused by the -notif drafts),
>     > > if the outcome is slow can we just remove this example to be able
>     > > to advance those docs?
>     > 
>     > It appears that the outcome is slow.  Any objection to removing the
>     > example so the Last Call can close?
>     
>     Yes, I object to that.  I think we need to address the issue, rather
>     than pretending it isn't an issue.  If we can't figure out what an
>     example looks like, how is an implementor supposed to get this right?
>     
>     IMO SN should adopt the solution proposed by Juergen, and the example
>     updated.
>     
>     
>     /martin
>     
>