Re: [Netconf] WG adoption poll draft-voit-netconf-notification-messages-01

Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com> Thu, 24 August 2017 16:05 UTC

Return-Path: <andy@yumaworks.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AA0F132BD5 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 09:05:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yumaworks-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ijKw40pVFvQm for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 09:05:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x230.google.com (mail-wr0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CED211320BD for <netconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 09:05:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x230.google.com with SMTP id r6so4005836wrg.0 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 09:05:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yumaworks-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=1/itWz7nOhnrVdZGmqM+E6UbIwxjPrnLLLKVv9bsK+o=; b=NX6/Zq328GXNupikNO4ii24kX5EgspDnmT+suEAIIAnm/tSk+5qlk7PSWaIZ4kZ2gM xJqdDrNt2lREGY75+XAScn0c47m5mrO5JTyR0Q3OGMsxEcplVi7Rp4UGPxLw0rVkroUI BJi1BD63VnqC+ZsC9nTwmhhtLTCQjQhH9X5nyXig1LRRMxVXmJJYoyLsZmKsU5wMG24U CorwEF4E4UmZgU//L87uGE+ypGlrIHkLMkQJ7n+hNg2e9pBv/dL1R8SD1QV9yeGlJC0D jNr7mmAggpeF4Zc9zvGSoGvCieT8Ds133YUFUqMp60Fe9ONLe+s1xNUCvt2H3bmU6AcK twlQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1/itWz7nOhnrVdZGmqM+E6UbIwxjPrnLLLKVv9bsK+o=; b=CnTQwqKfodIdf3xbuqwifLTKbu8JhOxpagr1ZIxErTqMREeEo5WqkbrrO+PwuHeAfp QfnOAf4Y61HX6MWMSTLUu8ccTrzPpf5+GO3tjV1LVdLP8aoN+n53E4V17mebw3qg1eqc F/k3psRPodD+fTQT2sKkfeWh+iEzJNyNpp/l7IkeqHpIu6ugEw4CCuvuFn4fYJItuVJ3 wFhYranFZR/XdKLKBtOUjVOBa9l54KlljeSyjst7LWg6Xz1aIJWd/rTprGhkU/XdiQ6v 5h7zA+UfeWKQea9zz79beYRMSXA9JrouKgrBEPz6gcMkajQ3iSV97xXZB0PUNgUglzmF BAJA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5jAxbn+QpmfjsnikeWWVNtFGdQDLUXXC70pdHCtj7qCem1gkEYV Yn9TmGkCcACRjeL7B2ufTXEdlK+3b+k5
X-Received: by 10.223.128.165 with SMTP id 34mr3850686wrl.116.1503590700376; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 09:05:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.164.221 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 09:04:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20170824.142441.805099729739418168.mbj@tail-f.com>
References: <F94D3EAE-F8C1-4CB7-B0E8-CC9E4F795C71@juniper.net> <20170824.142441.805099729739418168.mbj@tail-f.com>
From: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 09:04:59 -0700
Message-ID: <CABCOCHQsQZk=Gu_-jmOvh0-ba-xYF=p=iSvRPMQW3TwWgvBPxQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
Cc: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>, Netconf <netconf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c05aeac957d9e055781fda2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/2jp3aQJ_E5Uq724k56PcyLo--To>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] WG adoption poll draft-voit-netconf-notification-messages-01
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 16:05:06 -0000

On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 5:24 AM, Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I support the problem statement in this draft, but I have concerns
> with the proposed solution.
>
> Currently, the notification message is defined in RFC 5277, for both
> NETCONF and RESTCONF.  It has a non-exensible header, and I agree that
> it would be good to fix that.
>
> We have a set of notfication-related documents that are supposed to
> replace RFC 5277, to make it more flexible.  I think that one of the
> documents in this set (not sure which one) needs to properly define a
> new notification message, and introduce an extensibility mechanism for
> the header.  Then a followup document (like
> draft-voit-netconf-notification-messages) can use this extensibility
> mechanism to define more common header fields.
>
> On another level, I'm also worried that this becomes a kitchen-sink of
> various headers that may or may not useful.  I would prefer an
> initially small set of well thought-through headers, and work from
> there.
>
> I would like to see these concerns addressed before the WG adopts this
> document.
>
>
I agree these issues need to be addressed.

Many other protocols have these properties:
  1) ability to add headers over time in separate RFCs
  2) ability to identify mandatory vs. optional property (even if nothing
else understood)
  3) ability to skip over unknown optional headers


> /martin
>
>
Andy


>
> Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net> wrote:
> >
> > All,
> >
> > This is start of a two-week poll on making the following draft a
> > NETCONF working group document:
> >
> >   draft-voit-netconf-notification-messages-01 [1]
> >
> > Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not
> > support".  If indicating no, please state your reservations with the
> > document.  If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like
> > to see addressed once the document is a WG document.
> >
> >
> > [1] https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-voit-netconf-
> notification-messages-01
> >
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Kent (and Mahesh)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Netconf mailing list
> > Netconf@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Netconf mailing list
> Netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
>