IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Netconf] WG adoption poll draft-voit-netconf-notification-messages-01

Henk Birkholz <henk.birkholz@sit.fraunhofer.de> Mon, 04 September 2017 07:56 UTC

Return-Path: <henk.birkholz@sit.fraunhofer.de>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 627A51320BD; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 00:56:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9zs48PMzt0UG; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 00:56:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from iron01.fraunhofer.de (iron01.fraunhofer.de [153.96.1.54]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF999126DD9; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 00:55:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A2E3AwBSBq1Z/xoHYZlcGwEBAQMBAQEJAQEBg1pkgRUHg3CaPYFxljaCBAojhRsChBlXAQIBAQEBAQIDaCiCZUZYAQEBAQEBIwI+LAEBAiYPAQU/AgwNAg4DAQMBAQMCIwMCSAECBg4BDAEFAgEBiiwFAQuYJJ1mgieLTQEBAQEBAQQBAQEBAQEBAQEaBYENgh2CAoFOgWMrgn2EQgESAYMygmEFoHSBB4EnhS2PCYVng1UFhx2UfgIDBgUCGAGBOVhBQQtTJV2HHXSIbYEjAYEOAQEB
X-IPAS-Result: A2E3AwBSBq1Z/xoHYZlcGwEBAQMBAQEJAQEBg1pkgRUHg3CaPYFxljaCBAojhRsChBlXAQIBAQEBAQIDaCiCZUZYAQEBAQEBIwI+LAEBAiYPAQU/AgwNAg4DAQMBAQMCIwMCSAECBg4BDAEFAgEBiiwFAQuYJJ1mgieLTQEBAQEBAQQBAQEBAQEBAQEaBYENgh2CAoFOgWMrgn2EQgESAYMygmEFoHSBB4EnhS2PCYVng1UFhx2UfgIDBgUCGAGBOVhBQQtTJV2HHXSIbYEjAYEOAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.41,473,1498514400"; d="scan'208";a="99129058"
Received: from mail-mtas26.fraunhofer.de ([153.97.7.26]) by iron01.fraunhofer.de with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA; 04 Sep 2017 09:55:57 +0200
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.41,473,1498514400"; d="scan'208";a="260160717"
X-IronPort-Outbreak-Status: No, level 0, Unknown - Unknown
Received: from mailext.sit.fraunhofer.de ([141.12.72.89]) by mail-mtaS26.fraunhofer.de with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 04 Sep 2017 09:55:54 +0200
Received: from mail.sit.fraunhofer.de (mail.sit.fraunhofer.de [141.12.84.171]) by mailext.sit.fraunhofer.de (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id v847tqJk011648 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 4 Sep 2017 09:55:53 +0200
Received: from [10.119.133.32] (141.12.129.132) by mail.sit.fraunhofer.de (141.12.84.171) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.361.1; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 09:55:46 +0200
From: Henk Birkholz <henk.birkholz@sit.fraunhofer.de>
To: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>, draft-voit-netconf-notification-messages@ietf.org
CC: netconf@ietf.org
Message-ID: <ca8268c5-a675-d35a-a7c7-d42e8c317a65@sit.fraunhofer.de>
Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2017 09:55:45 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Originating-IP: [141.12.129.132]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/znxeQ_lblh2tmFlvj6Qm5pmkMHc>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] WG adoption poll draft-voit-netconf-notification-messages-01
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2017 07:56:03 -0000

Hi,

I support this document to be adopted by the WG.

A few comments:

The header objects align well with the content-element metadata in the 
SACM WG. At the last Hackathon (in Prague) we showed interoperability 
between the SACM architecture and YANG push provided content. This draft 
would simplify the use cases even more in respect to automation and 
post-processing capabilities.

If we can make the terminology and semantics of the header objects in 
notification messages and the SACM terminology/information model align, 
this also would simplify interoperability. The same is true, we assume, 
for interoperability with the Information Model for the Monitoring of 
Network Security Functions in the I2NSF WG.


Viele Grüße,

Henk


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Netconf [mailto:netconf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Kent Watsen
> Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 6:06 AM
> To: netconf@ietf.org
> Subject: [Netconf] WG adoption poll
> draft-voit-netconf-notification-messages-01>
> 
> 
> All,
> 
> This is start of a two-week poll on making the following draft a
> NETCONF working group document:
> 
>   draft-voit-netconf-notification-messages-01 [1]
> 
> Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not
> support".  If indicating no, please state your reservations with the
> document.  If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like
> to see addressed once the document is a WG document.
> 
> 
> [1] https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-voit-netconf-notification-messages-01
> 
> 
> Thank you,
> Kent (and Mahesh)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email