IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Netconf] WG Adoption Call for draft-bierman-netconf-rfc6536bis WAS:FW: new NACM draft

Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz> Thu, 15 December 2016 08:01 UTC

Return-Path: <lhotka@nic.cz>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28485129461 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 00:01:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nic.cz
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MXikKnYtIXB6 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 00:01:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.nic.cz (mail.nic.cz [217.31.204.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6867128B44 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 00:01:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:718:1a02:1:3cde:959f:d398:7940] (unknown [IPv6:2001:718:1a02:1:3cde:959f:d398:7940]) by mail.nic.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D7A6060D14; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 09:01:12 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=nic.cz; s=default; t=1481788872; bh=39D+IV5HGkHCW6pZIwSntGi1KYSuMAhotXl3I5goXtk=; h=From:Date:To; b=jk9oEoN762MulXq7atTz9bB+BTCQpOXfc81RurL/iiIupCeqa+XjJP4t3NfRqd7ct 8IkSHbxy6axzrtCrSiW8GtwRnTka8do/XMiN86J4x2damkr7AfIjUO1mF8RT4SthT9 ZolPCE2yKLaJqijONomEBzRh4Sv9YEBioPtcDyaE=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
From: Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>
In-Reply-To: <03ce01d2564f$d3c23150$7b4693f0$@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 09:01:12 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <3225C63B-0C41-4104-B619-495E6952EF66@nic.cz>
References: <03ce01d2564f$d3c23150$7b4693f0$@gmail.com>
To: Mehmet Ersue <mersue@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at mail
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/4uZ6RQYBKkCvzrNiX-_gJ9Ni9uk>
Cc: Netconf <netconf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] WG Adoption Call for draft-bierman-netconf-rfc6536bis WAS:FW: new NACM draft
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 08:01:17 -0000

Support. Lada

> On 14 Dec 2016, at 22:19, Mehmet Ersue <mersue@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Dear NETCONF WG,
> 
> for the potential topics to add we only got comments from Martin. We assume
> now there are no other comments.
> 
> This is a 2+ week WG adoption call for draft-bierman-netconf-rfc6536bis to
> adopt as NETCONF WG item.
> 
> Please state your opinion on the mail list by December 30, 2016 with
> "yes/support" or "no support".  
> 
> If you support, please let us know what you would like to address
> additionally.
> If you don't support, please elaborate your reasons.  
> 
> Thank you,
> Mehmet & Mahesh
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Bjorklund [mailto:mbj@tail-f.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2016 9:20 AM
> To: mersue@gmail.com
> Cc: andy@yumaworks.com; netconf@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Netconf] new NACM draft
> 
> MehmetErsue <mersue@gmail.com <mailto:mersue@gmail.com> > wrote:
>> Hi Andy, Martin,
>> 
>> thank you for the initial draft.
>> 
>> We discussed in IETF 97 different issues and the additional sections 
>> we could add.
> 
> Ok.  But do we have to resolve all issues before adopting this document?  I
> think the current document is ready for adoption, and then the WG can work
> on fixing any open issues.
> 
>> IIRC the list was:
>> - schema-mount related text into schema-mount or the NACM draft,
> 
> I think schema mount needs to discuss how it works with NACM.  This should
> be an open issue in schema mount.
> 
>> - assigning priorities to clients,
> 
> I don't believe this is a NACM issue.
> 
>> - access control on dynamic datastores (e.g. I2RS),
> 
> The text in 3.2 probably need to be relaxed a bit to allow NACM to be
> applied to other datastores.
> 
>> - the issue from RFC 6536 with parent/child relationships which is 
>> important for RESTCONF.
> 
> Can you elaborate on this?
> 
> 
> /martin
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>> I would like to suggest to have a discussion on these issues and 
>> understand whether they should be included.
>> 
>> Mehmet
>> 
>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 2:10 AM, Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com
> <mailto:andy@yumaworks.com> > wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> A new version of draft-bierman-netconf-rfc6536bis has been posted:
>>> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-bierman-netconf-rfc6536bis-01.txt
>>> 
>>> 
>>> We would like this draft to be adopted as the starting point for 
>>> item #5 in the current NETCONF charter.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Andy and Martin
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Netconf mailing list
>>> Netconf@ietf.org <mailto:Netconf@ietf.org> 
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Mehmet
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Netconf mailing list
> Netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf

--
Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs
PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email