Re: [Netconf] WG Adoption Call for draft-bierman-netconf-rfc6536bis WAS:FW: new NACM draft

I support this update since it is necessary to make NACM work with
YANG 1.1 and RESTCONF (and I think this should be the scope of this
update effort).

/js

On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 10:19:59PM +0100, Mehmet Ersue wrote:
> Dear NETCONF WG,
> 
> for the potential topics to add we only got comments from Martin. We assume
> now there are no other comments.
> 
> This is a 2+ week WG adoption call for draft-bierman-netconf-rfc6536bis to
> adopt as NETCONF WG item.
> 
> Please state your opinion on the mail list by December 30, 2016 with
> "yes/support" or "no support".  
> 
> If you support, please let us know what you would like to address
> additionally.
> If you don't support, please elaborate your reasons.  
> 
> Thank you,
> Mehmet & Mahesh
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Bjorklund [mailto:mbj@tail-f.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2016 9:20 AM
> To: mersue@gmail.com
> Cc: andy@yumaworks.com; netconf@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Netconf] new NACM draft
> 
> MehmetErsue <mersue@gmail.com <mailto:mersue@gmail.com> > wrote:
> > Hi Andy, Martin,
> > 
> > thank you for the initial draft.
> > 
> > We discussed in IETF 97 different issues and the additional sections 
> > we could add.
> 
> Ok.  But do we have to resolve all issues before adopting this document?  I
> think the current document is ready for adoption, and then the WG can work
> on fixing any open issues.
> 
> > IIRC the list was:
> > - schema-mount related text into schema-mount or the NACM draft,
> 
> I think schema mount needs to discuss how it works with NACM.  This should
> be an open issue in schema mount.
> 
> > - assigning priorities to clients,
> 
> I don't believe this is a NACM issue.
> 
> > - access control on dynamic datastores (e.g. I2RS),
> 
> The text in 3.2 probably need to be relaxed a bit to allow NACM to be
> applied to other datastores.
> 
> > - the issue from RFC 6536 with parent/child relationships which is 
> > important for RESTCONF.
> 
> Can you elaborate on this?
> 
> 
> /martin
> 
> 
> 
> > 
> > I would like to suggest to have a discussion on these issues and 
> > understand whether they should be included.
> > 
> > Mehmet
> > 
> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 2:10 AM, Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com
> <mailto:andy@yumaworks.com> > wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > A new version of draft-bierman-netconf-rfc6536bis has been posted:
> > > https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-bierman-netconf-rfc6536bis-01.txt
> > >
> > >
> > > We would like this draft to be adopted as the starting point for 
> > > item #5 in the current NETCONF charter.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Andy and Martin
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Netconf mailing list
> > > Netconf@ietf.org <mailto:Netconf@ietf.org> 
> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Mehmet
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Netconf mailing list
> Netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>