IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netconf] Adoption call for draft-kwatsen-netconf-http-client-server-04

Kent Watsen <kent@watsen.net> Thu, 07 November 2019 15:10 UTC

Return-Path: <0100016e466ae626-e9821117-8286-4f26-bc91-284d7dcaa453-000000@amazonses.watsen.net>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9A0D12089D; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 07:10:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amazonses.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 88IYGhrb8QKu; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 07:10:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from a8-33.smtp-out.amazonses.com (a8-33.smtp-out.amazonses.com [54.240.8.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACDA112083C; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 07:10:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple; s=6gbrjpgwjskckoa6a5zn6fwqkn67xbtw; d=amazonses.com; t=1573139441; h=From:Message-Id:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References:Feedback-ID; bh=nNASjj9ThbxFJkhVbzWACteU2ewWUroAL8JUN8QCSXQ=; b=KovHiiZ9FGWoP9bnEHEI63xU3fnUNQNHkIH72aEI3Tat4fnHidscCvyB3/F5j4GJ ySO2dHh9G7Nh2EHdUpSqEBiVbwboovwFdPx6jNOexdqfVu4IlOkPCVuoQ+Wi3StpyZV dnNqGuWvEjatlRFrAtqQuy2uWjGC34s5GhyNr+Ns=
From: Kent Watsen <kent@watsen.net>
Message-ID: <0100016e466ae626-e9821117-8286-4f26-bc91-284d7dcaa453-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_9D497D6C-2C42-4931-BBBE-696900EDF02E"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2019 15:10:41 +0000
In-Reply-To: <20191107073755.kw6xqp5uqruiask6@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
Cc: "httpbis-chairs@ietf.org" <httpbis-chairs@ietf.org>, "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <J.Schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
References: <704A1489-3BC0-4EFF-A5B0-7D664EA05970@gmail.com> <20191104.093427.842126049822749848.mbj@tail-f.com> <0100016e432d004b-32e62ef2-4e6c-48f6-8fa4-092c55778ea8-000000@email.amazonses.com> <20191107073755.kw6xqp5uqruiask6@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
X-SES-Outgoing: 2019.11.07-54.240.8.33
Feedback-ID: 1.us-east-1.DKmIRZFhhsBhtmFMNikgwZUWVrODEw9qVcPhqJEI2DA=:AmazonSES
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/5iMiiVdYAxVLRGWkPyPZCnoBiso>
Subject: Re: [netconf] Adoption call for draft-kwatsen-netconf-http-client-server-04
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2019 15:10:44 -0000

Hi Juergen,

>> Noteworthily, the HTTP experts additionally said that they would have no issue if the module were called something else (ietf-restful-http-client/server?) as then it wouldn't appear to intending to be an all-encompassing HTTP definition and it would no longer require involvement of the HTTP experts to ensure correctness.
>> 
> 
> Changing the module name to ietf-restful-http-client/server makes any
> reuse of the definitions look back.

Can you clarify what you mean by "look back"?

Thanks,
Kent


> I also think that the module
> should ensure correctness, perhaps not completeness.
> 
> /js

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email