Re: [Netconf] We NEED RESPONSES: WG Last Call ended for:draft-ietf-netconf-4741bis-04.txt
" Andy Bierman " <ietf@andybierman.com> Wed, 06 October 2010 14:59 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@andybierman.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE79A3A6F7B for <netconf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 07:59:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.643
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.643 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.327, BAYES_00=-2.599, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=1.456, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.96, SARE_SUB_ENC_UTF8=0.152]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lsZTyit0JAgj for <netconf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 07:59:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omr5.networksolutionsemail.com (omr5.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.55]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D384F3A6C4C for <netconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 07:59:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cm-omr1 (mail.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.149.5] (may be forged)) by omr5.networksolutionsemail.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id o96F0Rlx011924 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 11:00:27 -0400
Authentication-Results: cm-omr1 smtp.user=ietf@andybierman.com; auth=pass (LOGIN)
X-Authenticated-UID: ietf@andybierman.com
Received: from [173.126.165.113] ([173.126.165.113:59577] helo=[173.126.165.113]) by cm-omr1 (envelope-from <ietf@andybierman.com>) (ecelerity 2.2.2.41 r(31179/31189)) with ESMTPA id 25/00-11767-80F8CAC4; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 11:00:27 -0400
To: Phil Shafer <phil@juniper.net>, Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
Message-ID: <25.00.11767.80F8CAC4@cm-omr1>
From: Andy Bierman <ietf@andybierman.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 08:00:40 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_2_1286377240331"
Cc: "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] We NEED RESPONSES: WG Last Call ended for:draft-ietf-netconf-4741bis-04.txt
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netconf>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 14:59:29 -0000
No. Netconf uses XML. There is no requirement that YANG be used at all. It certainly does not factor into protocol conformance. Andy ----- Reply message ----- From: "Phil Shafer" <phil@juniper.net> Date: Wed, Oct 6, 2010 06:30 Subject: [Netconf] We NEED RESPONSES: WG Last Call ended for:draft-ietf-netconf-4741bis-04.txt To: "Juergen Schoenwaelder" <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> Cc: "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org> Juergen Schoenwaelder writes: >Since the document in question defines a protocol that carries XML, >having this reference may seem different from requiring a reference to >the YANG guidelines how to write a YANG proper module in every YANG >module. At least in the SMIv2 space, we managed to live without it. Are we talking about putting a reference to yang-usage in the netconf-bis just to say that the new yang module follows those guidelines? Thanks, Phil _______________________________________________ Netconf mailing list Netconf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
- Re: [Netconf] We NEED RESPONSES: WG Last Call end… Andy Bierman
- Re: [Netconf] We NEED RESPONSES: WG Last Call end… Andy Bierman